This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Too argumentative. To suggest that Armstrong's foes were "undeniably inferior" is to suggest that times don't matter in a racing sport. I don't notice the same hagiographic elements in Pete Sampras' entry. In many respects, Federer's opponents are even less competitive then Armstrong's were. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
24.187.30.223 (
talk)
12:38, 27 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Not least because of the comment above, I have deleted the section debating Coppi and Merckx. Please reinstate if you wish but, if you do, please spare a moment to make it more a statement of facts and not what struck me as a string of muddled opinions.
Les woodland (
talk)
12:58, 27 November 2008 (UTC)les woodlandreply
Reverted back to old
The page was a mess with the imdb inclusion so I reverted it back to an older oner.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Too argumentative. To suggest that Armstrong's foes were "undeniably inferior" is to suggest that times don't matter in a racing sport. I don't notice the same hagiographic elements in Pete Sampras' entry. In many respects, Federer's opponents are even less competitive then Armstrong's were. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
24.187.30.223 (
talk)
12:38, 27 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Not least because of the comment above, I have deleted the section debating Coppi and Merckx. Please reinstate if you wish but, if you do, please spare a moment to make it more a statement of facts and not what struck me as a string of muddled opinions.
Les woodland (
talk)
12:58, 27 November 2008 (UTC)les woodlandreply
Reverted back to old
The page was a mess with the imdb inclusion so I reverted it back to an older oner.