This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fatimah bint Asad article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is POV and need cleanup, its not Copyrighted.
I just Copypasted the whole thing since most of it is relevant, and all of it is generally accepted, exept for the "you son, you son" bit. So its factual accurat, but needs NPOVing and to be cleaned upp.
Anyone wants to help?
-- Striver 4 July 2005 01:42 (UTC)
Good work, Freestylefrappe. Now it needs al "hazrat" and "(saw)" to be removed :D
--
Striver 5 July 2005 02:02 (UTC)
Please explain here why this content is not copyrighted to the original author. -- nixie 01:37, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
Tickle me, bint is not a word in Arabic. Bint is incorrect since it leaves out the –e- from binte. See this page and it is on wikipedia, it has the right spelling of binte. And I don’t understand why the page is being reverted. Wikipedians should discuss the issue before they revert and they should carry out the action when a decision has been finalized. Thank You-- Salman 15:17, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
... Her grandsons, second Shi’a Imam Hassan ibn Ali and third Shi’a Imam Hussain ibn Ali are to be the leaders of the youths of Paradise ... ?! Guys, this is an encyclopaedia! Tājik 00:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
I've reverted a rather lengthy addition, consisting of over a dozen paragraphs taken almost verbatim from Great Women of Islam: Who were given the good News of Paradise (online at kalamullah.com). There's no copyright notice on the book at the website, but I don't believe that necessarily means that it's not copyrighted.
In any case, the style of the copied passage is non-encyclopedic and fails WP:NPOV. If material from the book is used as a source for this article, it should be rewritten to avoid any possibility of copyvio, and to give it the tone of an encyclopedia article rather than a hagiography. Ammodramus ( talk) 02:58, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
I reverted this strange edit. I hope it is not a problem. Ghazaalch ( talk) 04:14, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fatimah bint Asad article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is POV and need cleanup, its not Copyrighted.
I just Copypasted the whole thing since most of it is relevant, and all of it is generally accepted, exept for the "you son, you son" bit. So its factual accurat, but needs NPOVing and to be cleaned upp.
Anyone wants to help?
-- Striver 4 July 2005 01:42 (UTC)
Good work, Freestylefrappe. Now it needs al "hazrat" and "(saw)" to be removed :D
--
Striver 5 July 2005 02:02 (UTC)
Please explain here why this content is not copyrighted to the original author. -- nixie 01:37, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
Tickle me, bint is not a word in Arabic. Bint is incorrect since it leaves out the –e- from binte. See this page and it is on wikipedia, it has the right spelling of binte. And I don’t understand why the page is being reverted. Wikipedians should discuss the issue before they revert and they should carry out the action when a decision has been finalized. Thank You-- Salman 15:17, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
... Her grandsons, second Shi’a Imam Hassan ibn Ali and third Shi’a Imam Hussain ibn Ali are to be the leaders of the youths of Paradise ... ?! Guys, this is an encyclopaedia! Tājik 00:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
I've reverted a rather lengthy addition, consisting of over a dozen paragraphs taken almost verbatim from Great Women of Islam: Who were given the good News of Paradise (online at kalamullah.com). There's no copyright notice on the book at the website, but I don't believe that necessarily means that it's not copyrighted.
In any case, the style of the copied passage is non-encyclopedic and fails WP:NPOV. If material from the book is used as a source for this article, it should be rewritten to avoid any possibility of copyvio, and to give it the tone of an encyclopedia article rather than a hagiography. Ammodramus ( talk) 02:58, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
I reverted this strange edit. I hope it is not a problem. Ghazaalch ( talk) 04:14, 17 July 2021 (UTC)