![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Is this an advertisement? The talk of benefits, constant use of second-person ( "you can ..." and "your application can ..." ), and other red flags abound in this text.
The source for this section appears to be: http://www.liquid-technologies.com Jmuk74 ( talk) 14:16, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Since May 2009, somebody removed the word "free" from "Free public download" of the standard, and somebody else then added the words "Non-free". This is incorrect. The download of the standard in PDF format is free both from the ISO website and from the ITU website. What is "non-free" is the document in Word (.doc) format.
I find the Structure section of the article confusing:
Daniel.flassig.3 ( talk) 20:16, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 19:05, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Is this an advertisement? The talk of benefits, constant use of second-person ( "you can ..." and "your application can ..." ), and other red flags abound in this text.
The source for this section appears to be: http://www.liquid-technologies.com Jmuk74 ( talk) 14:16, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Since May 2009, somebody removed the word "free" from "Free public download" of the standard, and somebody else then added the words "Non-free". This is incorrect. The download of the standard in PDF format is free both from the ISO website and from the ITU website. What is "non-free" is the document in Word (.doc) format.
I find the Structure section of the article confusing:
Daniel.flassig.3 ( talk) 20:16, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 19:05, 25 June 2013 (UTC)