![]() | This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
(NH) FastCode is an integral and important part of the Embarcadero Delphi Product ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embarcadero_Delphi). Why is this article being considered for deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by NickHodges ( talk • contribs) 19:46, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Well, that is no longer true. There are now at least two inbound links, and three references that vouch for the notability of the organization. Nick Hodges —Preceding undated comment added 20:02, 19 January 2011 (UTC).
Can I add a bibliography section with references to two print magazine articles? The articles are not available online, but they are mentioned in the table of contents for those issues. Blwhite ( talk) 02:09, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
The "marked for deletion" box is designed badly as it contains no direct link to the discussion about why it's being considered for deletion. All links originating from that box require further manual search for the page listing the reasons. Why not make it technically possible to directly link from the box to the discussion? That would save the user's time a lot.-- 62.224.190.65 ( talk) 20:03, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
What do recommend for links like this? Thanks. http://books.google.dk/books?id=WCrzCSuNfHoC&pg=PA64&lpg=PA64&dq=fastmm+delphi&source=bl&ots=nmf3lvxc0G&sig=mBWWTH_XN7QJIRmC2ChTlUuw3I8&hl=da&ei=yH85TfGmFcKRswaKqrDzBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CEgQ6AEwBji2Ag#v=onepage&q&f=false Blwhite ( talk) 21:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
(NH) FastCode is an integral and important part of the Embarcadero Delphi Product ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embarcadero_Delphi). Why is this article being considered for deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by NickHodges ( talk • contribs) 19:46, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Well, that is no longer true. There are now at least two inbound links, and three references that vouch for the notability of the organization. Nick Hodges —Preceding undated comment added 20:02, 19 January 2011 (UTC).
Can I add a bibliography section with references to two print magazine articles? The articles are not available online, but they are mentioned in the table of contents for those issues. Blwhite ( talk) 02:09, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
The "marked for deletion" box is designed badly as it contains no direct link to the discussion about why it's being considered for deletion. All links originating from that box require further manual search for the page listing the reasons. Why not make it technically possible to directly link from the box to the discussion? That would save the user's time a lot.-- 62.224.190.65 ( talk) 20:03, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
What do recommend for links like this? Thanks. http://books.google.dk/books?id=WCrzCSuNfHoC&pg=PA64&lpg=PA64&dq=fastmm+delphi&source=bl&ots=nmf3lvxc0G&sig=mBWWTH_XN7QJIRmC2ChTlUuw3I8&hl=da&ei=yH85TfGmFcKRswaKqrDzBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CEgQ6AEwBji2Ag#v=onepage&q&f=false Blwhite ( talk) 21:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)