This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written entirely from the Bangladeshi point of view with a negative unjustified bias towards India. None of the citations are Indian as well. The point that due to this barrage and diversion of water into Bangladesh the Calcutta port has become non-existent is also not highlighted. ( 14.139.97.77 ( talk) 04:00, 5 July 2012 (UTC))
Arjun Kumar Singh — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.234.51.221 ( talk) 04:36, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
If the United Nations General Assembly ruled on Bangladesh's complaint in November 1976, then it most definitely was not brought in 1977. I would rather someone with knowledge edit this than myself, but this is obviously, screamingly wrong. Simplton ( talk) 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Farakka Barrage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written entirely from the Bangladeshi point of view with a negative unjustified bias towards India. None of the citations are Indian as well. The point that due to this barrage and diversion of water into Bangladesh the Calcutta port has become non-existent is also not highlighted. ( 14.139.97.77 ( talk) 04:00, 5 July 2012 (UTC))
Arjun Kumar Singh — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.234.51.221 ( talk) 04:36, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
If the United Nations General Assembly ruled on Bangladesh's complaint in November 1976, then it most definitely was not brought in 1977. I would rather someone with knowledge edit this than myself, but this is obviously, screamingly wrong. Simplton ( talk) 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Farakka Barrage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)