This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Polynesia: Samoa Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polynesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Polynesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolynesiaWikipedia:WikiProject PolynesiaTemplate:WikiProject PolynesiaPolynesia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Samoa (assessed as Low-importance). Volcanoes Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Islands This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

This is one of many senseless one-line articles of Wikipedia. Maybe after searching the whole web, one can make a three-line article out of it.

The point is, this island is one of four of the Aleitapu Islands. Does each of this tiny islands need an article of its own? Or would it not be better to have a comprehensive article about the group, where each island gets a section of a few lines?-- Ratzer 16:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Perhaps you are right in this case. -- Seattle Skier (talk) 11:24, 8 May 2007 (UTC) reply