![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article needs sourcing. I wikified the set-up, but certain parts of the article appear to either be biased, or misleading. SOURCES ARE NEEDED!!! Strongfaithin1 23:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)strongfaithin1 Strongfaithin1 23:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
I don't know much about the subject matter but much of this article seems to be written from an anti-Families Acting for Innocent Relatives point of view. I have tried to correct this as much as I can but it would benefit from an editer who has a better understanding of the issues.
I wanted to not that I completely removed the following block quote from the ==Controversies== section. Its inclusion lacked neutrality and does nothing, in my opinion, for the clarity of the article. I don't think that this type of viewpoint is helpful in an encyclopedic entry. I put it here in case folks feel a need to discuss my decision.
Susan McKay, the author of Northern Protestants: An Unsettled People has said:
Fair, Frazer admitted to a House of Commons select committee hearing... 'We are seen as the bad boys within the victims sector,' he said. This is largely because of its aggressive insistence that there are "innocent" and "genuine" and "real" victims, and there are others who have no right to call themselves victims at all. According to Fair and the DUP, Eugene Reavey is in the latter category. It is an appalling lie.
[1] ^ McKay, Susan (2005). Northern Protestants: An unsettled people. The Blackstaff Press. ISBN 978-0-85640-771-0.
Hippychick 02:31, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
References
Proposals for change can be discussed here. Wholesale deletion of referenced content you don't like is unreasonable. -- Flexdream ( talk) 12:27, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article needs sourcing. I wikified the set-up, but certain parts of the article appear to either be biased, or misleading. SOURCES ARE NEEDED!!! Strongfaithin1 23:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)strongfaithin1 Strongfaithin1 23:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
I don't know much about the subject matter but much of this article seems to be written from an anti-Families Acting for Innocent Relatives point of view. I have tried to correct this as much as I can but it would benefit from an editer who has a better understanding of the issues.
I wanted to not that I completely removed the following block quote from the ==Controversies== section. Its inclusion lacked neutrality and does nothing, in my opinion, for the clarity of the article. I don't think that this type of viewpoint is helpful in an encyclopedic entry. I put it here in case folks feel a need to discuss my decision.
Susan McKay, the author of Northern Protestants: An Unsettled People has said:
Fair, Frazer admitted to a House of Commons select committee hearing... 'We are seen as the bad boys within the victims sector,' he said. This is largely because of its aggressive insistence that there are "innocent" and "genuine" and "real" victims, and there are others who have no right to call themselves victims at all. According to Fair and the DUP, Eugene Reavey is in the latter category. It is an appalling lie.
[1] ^ McKay, Susan (2005). Northern Protestants: An unsettled people. The Blackstaff Press. ISBN 978-0-85640-771-0.
Hippychick 02:31, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
References
Proposals for change can be discussed here. Wholesale deletion of referenced content you don't like is unreasonable. -- Flexdream ( talk) 12:27, 31 March 2012 (UTC)