This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Aircraft This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the aircraft project. Military history: Aviation / British / Spanish This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force British military history task force Spanish military history task force

According to the specifications listed in the article, the cruising speed is considerably higher than the maximum speed. Obviously a mistake here. I don't know the correct specifications for this aircraft so I can't correct it, but if someone else has a source of information then perhaps they could correct this? 212.84.125.82 ( talk) 16:14, 5 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Well spotted the quoted crusing speed is actually the max speed - article corrected. MilborneOne ( talk) 21:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC) reply