This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of
New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Since this company was never known as simply Fairchild I suggest moving, and letting the disambig take the Fairchild spot. But since it has changed names a few times, I figured I'd request some input.
FrozenPurpleCube 19:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)reply
You are right, Fairchild doesn't really work- what about Fairchild (aircraft manufacturer) as a more accurate title/description.
Bzuk 20:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)reply
There are some disrepancies between this article,
M7 Aerospace, and
AvCraft Aviation, specifically with regard to the bankruptcy transaction dates. Anyone have clear data on this? —
Joseph/N328KF(Talk) 03:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Not completely clarified, but see this: 2003: Fairchild Dornier's assets go to AvCraft (Virginia, USA), M7 Aerospace (Texas, USA) and RUAG Aerospace (Switzerland) - from
http://www.shanaberger.com/fairchild.htmArchtransit (
talk) 22:24, 8 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Merge with Fairchild Industries
This article should be merged with
Fairchild Industries, since they are about the same corporation. --
rogerd 11:12, 22 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Disagree. It's a good idea to have the aircarf manufacturing side separate from the parent companies. Pratt & Whittney and Sikorsky are separate from United Technologies, and Bell Helicopter and Cessna are separate from Textron. However,
Fairchild Corporation and
Fairchild Industries are both short stubs, and could probably be better off together. -
BillCJ 05:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep separate. The Fairchild Industries article can and should be expanded on its own. This article is OK by itself. The Fairchild Aircraft Ltd. Canada article might could merged to here. I'm sure some more details could be added here as well. -
Fnlayson 12:36, 31 August 2007 (UTC)reply
No consensus. Enough time has occurred in the discussion phase; tag removed. FWIW
Bzuk 02:02, 16 September 2007 (UTC).reply
and yet in 2021
Fairchild Industries just redirects to this
Fairchild Aircraft which seems to ignore all non aviation business. What was the business between 1984 and 1996 ? -
Rod57 (
talk) 14:20, 27 June 2021 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of
New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Since this company was never known as simply Fairchild I suggest moving, and letting the disambig take the Fairchild spot. But since it has changed names a few times, I figured I'd request some input.
FrozenPurpleCube 19:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)reply
You are right, Fairchild doesn't really work- what about Fairchild (aircraft manufacturer) as a more accurate title/description.
Bzuk 20:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)reply
There are some disrepancies between this article,
M7 Aerospace, and
AvCraft Aviation, specifically with regard to the bankruptcy transaction dates. Anyone have clear data on this? —
Joseph/N328KF(Talk) 03:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Not completely clarified, but see this: 2003: Fairchild Dornier's assets go to AvCraft (Virginia, USA), M7 Aerospace (Texas, USA) and RUAG Aerospace (Switzerland) - from
http://www.shanaberger.com/fairchild.htmArchtransit (
talk) 22:24, 8 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Merge with Fairchild Industries
This article should be merged with
Fairchild Industries, since they are about the same corporation. --
rogerd 11:12, 22 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Disagree. It's a good idea to have the aircarf manufacturing side separate from the parent companies. Pratt & Whittney and Sikorsky are separate from United Technologies, and Bell Helicopter and Cessna are separate from Textron. However,
Fairchild Corporation and
Fairchild Industries are both short stubs, and could probably be better off together. -
BillCJ 05:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep separate. The Fairchild Industries article can and should be expanded on its own. This article is OK by itself. The Fairchild Aircraft Ltd. Canada article might could merged to here. I'm sure some more details could be added here as well. -
Fnlayson 12:36, 31 August 2007 (UTC)reply
No consensus. Enough time has occurred in the discussion phase; tag removed. FWIW
Bzuk 02:02, 16 September 2007 (UTC).reply
and yet in 2021
Fairchild Industries just redirects to this
Fairchild Aircraft which seems to ignore all non aviation business. What was the business between 1984 and 1996 ? -
Rod57 (
talk) 14:20, 27 June 2021 (UTC)reply