"...it would be more advantageous to try and score a touchdown unless there is little to no time left in the half." - These doesn't really support a neutral point of view. According to the reference, this is what some one is saying/thinks; so this comes from a one person perspective.--
Dom497 (
talk) 18:57, 23 June 2013 (UTC)reply
IMO, its still showing a person perspective. All you really did was add the name who said it. Someone else can say the opposite. I'll ask for a second opinion.--
Dom497 (
talk) 17:50, 24 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Sure, but I would argue the person in question (a former NFL director of officiating for over two decades, as noted on the article), is well-qualified to make statements like that. I could modify it slightly to make it clearer he said it, however. ToaNidhiki05 17:56, 24 June 2013 (UTC)reply
You know what, its fine as is.--
Dom497 (
talk) 20:55, 25 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Though its not really required for GA, I would suggest putting a legend at the top of the first table mentioning what green and red mean.--
Dom497 (
talk) 18:57, 23 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Isn't the publisher for ref 46 ESPN? This ref also follows a different format for the access date so I suggest you fix it to keep it consistent with the other refs.--
Dom497 (
talk) 19:00, 23 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Some refs are missing access dates (Books don't need them as far as I know but some of the LA times and other news papers need them).--
Dom497 (
talk) 19:03, 23 June 2013 (UTC)reply
I have added access dates to all newspaper citations. ToaNidhiki05 20:48, 23 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Just one last comment. There should be some prose in the section that has the lists (such as just a quick explanation on what the tables mean and the fact that 4 out of 26 are good and none have ever scored points in exhibition games).--
Dom497 (
talk) 20:52, 25 June 2013 (UTC)reply
I have given a concise explanation now; unless there is more information needed, it should be complete there. ToaNidhiki05 03:10, 26 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Good work; all comments addressed.--
Dom497 (
talk) 23:13, 28 June 2013 (UTC)reply
"...it would be more advantageous to try and score a touchdown unless there is little to no time left in the half." - These doesn't really support a neutral point of view. According to the reference, this is what some one is saying/thinks; so this comes from a one person perspective.--
Dom497 (
talk) 18:57, 23 June 2013 (UTC)reply
IMO, its still showing a person perspective. All you really did was add the name who said it. Someone else can say the opposite. I'll ask for a second opinion.--
Dom497 (
talk) 17:50, 24 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Sure, but I would argue the person in question (a former NFL director of officiating for over two decades, as noted on the article), is well-qualified to make statements like that. I could modify it slightly to make it clearer he said it, however. ToaNidhiki05 17:56, 24 June 2013 (UTC)reply
You know what, its fine as is.--
Dom497 (
talk) 20:55, 25 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Though its not really required for GA, I would suggest putting a legend at the top of the first table mentioning what green and red mean.--
Dom497 (
talk) 18:57, 23 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Isn't the publisher for ref 46 ESPN? This ref also follows a different format for the access date so I suggest you fix it to keep it consistent with the other refs.--
Dom497 (
talk) 19:00, 23 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Some refs are missing access dates (Books don't need them as far as I know but some of the LA times and other news papers need them).--
Dom497 (
talk) 19:03, 23 June 2013 (UTC)reply
I have added access dates to all newspaper citations. ToaNidhiki05 20:48, 23 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Just one last comment. There should be some prose in the section that has the lists (such as just a quick explanation on what the tables mean and the fact that 4 out of 26 are good and none have ever scored points in exhibition games).--
Dom497 (
talk) 20:52, 25 June 2013 (UTC)reply
I have given a concise explanation now; unless there is more information needed, it should be complete there. ToaNidhiki05 03:10, 26 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Good work; all comments addressed.--
Dom497 (
talk) 23:13, 28 June 2013 (UTC)reply