This article was nominated for deletion on Date. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles United States This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I would suggest improving the article and its sources, with a handy starter list provided by Reywas92. I have quoted their comment from the proposal to delete here, though I would avoid a few of the sources as they are written by individuals with a promotional bias (E.G. Rob Richie, of Fairvote).

Merge/redirect to Ranked-choice voting in the United States. I agree that the bill itself does not necessarily need a standalone article because of its lack of progress, but I vehemently disagree with your removal of any mention of this in the relevant main article and have undone that. A simple Google News search showed coverage in major sources including The Atlantic, the New York Times, NPR, Vox, and the Washington Post. Others are [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]. Some of these being opinion pieces does not negate that it should be covered somewhere.

Jasavina ( talk) 15:16, 24 June 2024 (UTC) reply