![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
I admit that my offering on facsimile is not the greatest, but I couldn't believe that all of the links for the term were being re-directed Fax. There was obviously an attempt in the past to cover this subject, but it got relegated to Wictionary—mentions of a merge and so forth. For what I can tell all discussions on the matter have been deleted from the record. So please, all you people knowledgeable in books, maps, prints, manuscripts, and archival processes, please make a good article here so that we are not being told that a facsimile of the Magna carta can be made by sending it through a fax machine. I think stamps, based on the German version are also relevant, but I don't have any knowledge of that subjects (purely art history here). Thanks! -- Stomme ( talk) 08:40, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Has anyone known if there is any standards available for people to following up ??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.240.237.138 ( talk) 04:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
The entire list of books section seems neither notable nor encyclopedic. It is at best an arbitrary representative sample; no one can ever hope for such a list to approach completion. Furthermore, it is prone to abuse, as evidenced by the large number of links to a single commercial supplier of facsimile editions. I have therefore removed this section, but thought it necessary to explain my motives here. Wilford Nusser ( talk) 21:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
I admit that my offering on facsimile is not the greatest, but I couldn't believe that all of the links for the term were being re-directed Fax. There was obviously an attempt in the past to cover this subject, but it got relegated to Wictionary—mentions of a merge and so forth. For what I can tell all discussions on the matter have been deleted from the record. So please, all you people knowledgeable in books, maps, prints, manuscripts, and archival processes, please make a good article here so that we are not being told that a facsimile of the Magna carta can be made by sending it through a fax machine. I think stamps, based on the German version are also relevant, but I don't have any knowledge of that subjects (purely art history here). Thanks! -- Stomme ( talk) 08:40, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Has anyone known if there is any standards available for people to following up ??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.240.237.138 ( talk) 04:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
The entire list of books section seems neither notable nor encyclopedic. It is at best an arbitrary representative sample; no one can ever hope for such a list to approach completion. Furthermore, it is prone to abuse, as evidenced by the large number of links to a single commercial supplier of facsimile editions. I have therefore removed this section, but thought it necessary to explain my motives here. Wilford Nusser ( talk) 21:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)