![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | FMA IAe 33 Pulqui II has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
The previous version (27 Dec 2007) states that the wings had a negative angle of incidence. I believe this to be an error; the picture seems to depict negative dihedral, so I am guessing that should be the correct term. A negative angle of incidence would mean the fuselage would have to fly much more nose-up . . I am going to change this term. If somebody (who is familiar with the actual airplane in Argentina) knows that I have changed this in error, please feel free to change it back to the previous wording. Raymondwinn ( talk) 22:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
The comment "Design Team and work imported from Nazi Germany. Not an indigenous aircraft." shown in one of the article edits, IMHO is not totally correct.
I guess that the reason is that the term "Indigenous design" is quite vague. Albeit is is true that the main designer was Kurt Tank and a team of german engineers, it is also true that the Pulqui II is a different aircraft to those desigend by Tank in "Nazi Germany". It was developed in Argentina, with support of the argentinian Air Force, and participation of argentinian engineers and workers. It was a new design, not a variant of a previous one; nor was built under license (as was for example the "Curtiss Hawk 75O").
So for me, sounds pretty "indigenous". Kind regards,
DPdH (
talk) —Preceding
comment was added at
09:16, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
I intend to translate ASAP into english the specs listed in the page mentioned in the link that "ive just added to the "External Links" section of this article. Regards, DPdH ( talk) 10:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Reviewer: Ian Rose ( talk) 15:51, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Reads okay, seems to adequately cover the subject, and all major points cited -- a few things though:
No worries, life happens. :) - The Bushranger Return fire Flank speed 10:44, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Despite the extensive history of the article's development and review, a challenge has been made on an image? FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 21:58, 1 July 2011 (UTC).
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on FMA IAe 33 Pulqui II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
"Welding had been a dichotomy in the manufacturing process necessitated by the paucity of modern forging and pressing equipment in Argentina".
Could the author of this sentence explain it a little more clearly please? I'm a fairly average reader, but I don't understand the use of "dichotomy" in this context.
Dichotomy (from Wiktionary)
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | FMA IAe 33 Pulqui II has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
The previous version (27 Dec 2007) states that the wings had a negative angle of incidence. I believe this to be an error; the picture seems to depict negative dihedral, so I am guessing that should be the correct term. A negative angle of incidence would mean the fuselage would have to fly much more nose-up . . I am going to change this term. If somebody (who is familiar with the actual airplane in Argentina) knows that I have changed this in error, please feel free to change it back to the previous wording. Raymondwinn ( talk) 22:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
The comment "Design Team and work imported from Nazi Germany. Not an indigenous aircraft." shown in one of the article edits, IMHO is not totally correct.
I guess that the reason is that the term "Indigenous design" is quite vague. Albeit is is true that the main designer was Kurt Tank and a team of german engineers, it is also true that the Pulqui II is a different aircraft to those desigend by Tank in "Nazi Germany". It was developed in Argentina, with support of the argentinian Air Force, and participation of argentinian engineers and workers. It was a new design, not a variant of a previous one; nor was built under license (as was for example the "Curtiss Hawk 75O").
So for me, sounds pretty "indigenous". Kind regards,
DPdH (
talk) —Preceding
comment was added at
09:16, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
I intend to translate ASAP into english the specs listed in the page mentioned in the link that "ive just added to the "External Links" section of this article. Regards, DPdH ( talk) 10:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Reviewer: Ian Rose ( talk) 15:51, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Reads okay, seems to adequately cover the subject, and all major points cited -- a few things though:
No worries, life happens. :) - The Bushranger Return fire Flank speed 10:44, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Despite the extensive history of the article's development and review, a challenge has been made on an image? FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 21:58, 1 July 2011 (UTC).
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on FMA IAe 33 Pulqui II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
"Welding had been a dichotomy in the manufacturing process necessitated by the paucity of modern forging and pressing equipment in Argentina".
Could the author of this sentence explain it a little more clearly please? I'm a fairly average reader, but I don't understand the use of "dichotomy" in this context.
Dichotomy (from Wiktionary)