![]() | Fôrça Bruta is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 21, 2019. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Força Bruta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
[1] Dan56 ( talk) 06:01, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Shouldn't the article be called "Força Bruta" without the accent? -- Joalpe ( talk) 00:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
This is a continuation of a review that began at this article's first FAC nomination. Since that review was very nearly complete when the nomination was closed by coordinators, I'm finishing it here for the benefit of nominator Dan56 with a future FAC in mind.
Internet Archive capture will one day expire permanently. It is best to have it this way. WebCite is back up again, by the way.Be that as it may, that's not what the |url= part of a citation template is there for. Even if it's a dead link, |url= should point to the original link. The only reason I can think of not to include an original link there is if the link is not only dead, but the original site has been hacked and the link now redirects to a shock site or a virus or something like that. If you want to double up on archival links in case of calamity that destroys the Internet Archive's servers—a feeling of paranoia that I relate to, btw, as an obsessive for backing up links—just use <!-- a hidden comment --> and embed the back-up URL there.
Tragically, the few comments above that are actual revision suggestions are not serious enough that it would have kept me from supporting, so I would have supported at this point. Naturally, I would support the article in any future FAC. (I'll even put it in bold here, as is customary. Why not?)
I'm really sorry, man. I really put you through the ringer for this review and you persevered. It's gotta be the most brutal and comprehensive FAC review I've ever given, but I only went this far in-depth because I felt the fundamentals were so strong, that on a basic level (research, organization, writing) it wasn't too far from FA condition. The effort you've put into this article is impressive, and doubly commendable given the under-representation of non-Anglosphere music on Wikipedia. It sounds like the coordinators may not have felt one more support would have been enough for consensus, but to whatever extent my dilly-dallying may have harmed the article's chances, I do apologize. I owe you one—one of what, I'm not sure (another review sometime? that probably doesn't sound too tempting after what I just put you through), but one all the same. — BLZ · talk 07:06, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() | Fôrça Bruta is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 21, 2019. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Força Bruta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
[1] Dan56 ( talk) 06:01, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Shouldn't the article be called "Força Bruta" without the accent? -- Joalpe ( talk) 00:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
This is a continuation of a review that began at this article's first FAC nomination. Since that review was very nearly complete when the nomination was closed by coordinators, I'm finishing it here for the benefit of nominator Dan56 with a future FAC in mind.
Internet Archive capture will one day expire permanently. It is best to have it this way. WebCite is back up again, by the way.Be that as it may, that's not what the |url= part of a citation template is there for. Even if it's a dead link, |url= should point to the original link. The only reason I can think of not to include an original link there is if the link is not only dead, but the original site has been hacked and the link now redirects to a shock site or a virus or something like that. If you want to double up on archival links in case of calamity that destroys the Internet Archive's servers—a feeling of paranoia that I relate to, btw, as an obsessive for backing up links—just use <!-- a hidden comment --> and embed the back-up URL there.
Tragically, the few comments above that are actual revision suggestions are not serious enough that it would have kept me from supporting, so I would have supported at this point. Naturally, I would support the article in any future FAC. (I'll even put it in bold here, as is customary. Why not?)
I'm really sorry, man. I really put you through the ringer for this review and you persevered. It's gotta be the most brutal and comprehensive FAC review I've ever given, but I only went this far in-depth because I felt the fundamentals were so strong, that on a basic level (research, organization, writing) it wasn't too far from FA condition. The effort you've put into this article is impressive, and doubly commendable given the under-representation of non-Anglosphere music on Wikipedia. It sounds like the coordinators may not have felt one more support would have been enough for consensus, but to whatever extent my dilly-dallying may have harmed the article's chances, I do apologize. I owe you one—one of what, I'm not sure (another review sometime? that probably doesn't sound too tempting after what I just put you through), but one all the same. — BLZ · talk 07:06, 1 December 2018 (UTC)