![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Anyone for moving this page to Augenmusik (with a redirect from Eye music)? I know that there's a preference for English terms when both English and foreign terms are in common circulation, but I don't know anyone who writes about this technique who doesn't use the German term. Even Donald Martino's composition uses the German term in preference to the English. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 04:36, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
I thought a lot about that myself when I started the entry.
Best, --- Shlishke ( talk) 21:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Word-painting is, despite it's "visual" analogy, an aurally perceived phenomenon. While not all listeners will be able to identify the musical characterisation of a word as an instance of the word-painting technique, untrained listeners will (contrary to the previous author's assertion) nevertheless still hear the same phenomenon - they will merely not be able to label it as this particular technique. More crucially, the fact that 'word-painting' creates an aural affect means that it cannot be "eye-music" as defined by this article, which is taken to be a VISUAL aspect of a score that cannot be heard (by ANYONE) in performance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.2.113.146 ( talk) 19:34, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Under Graphic Notation there is a mention of a Steiner score "shown here" which isn't actually visible. Was there a copyright issue without consequent text cleanup?
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Anyone for moving this page to Augenmusik (with a redirect from Eye music)? I know that there's a preference for English terms when both English and foreign terms are in common circulation, but I don't know anyone who writes about this technique who doesn't use the German term. Even Donald Martino's composition uses the German term in preference to the English. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 04:36, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
I thought a lot about that myself when I started the entry.
Best, --- Shlishke ( talk) 21:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Word-painting is, despite it's "visual" analogy, an aurally perceived phenomenon. While not all listeners will be able to identify the musical characterisation of a word as an instance of the word-painting technique, untrained listeners will (contrary to the previous author's assertion) nevertheless still hear the same phenomenon - they will merely not be able to label it as this particular technique. More crucially, the fact that 'word-painting' creates an aural affect means that it cannot be "eye-music" as defined by this article, which is taken to be a VISUAL aspect of a score that cannot be heard (by ANYONE) in performance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.2.113.146 ( talk) 19:34, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Under Graphic Notation there is a mention of a Steiner score "shown here" which isn't actually visible. Was there a copyright issue without consequent text cleanup?