GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Editoneer ( talk · contribs) 10:41, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Events and phenomena can themselves be Extremely Online;, I thought you already said so by saying above
a person or subject.
latter half of the 2010s (...) increasing prevalence and notability of Internet phenomena in all areas of life.What made it so relevant now and not pre-latter-half?
Extremely Online people are interested in topics "no normal, healthy person could possibly care about",, did you forget a "that"? And I'll personally object to that, because I believe I'm Extremely Online but I'm not interested in dubious topics. You also didn't use "are described as", and you stated it as a fact.
the Dirtbag Left, a coterie of underemployed and overly online millennials who were radicalised by the Iraq war and the 2008 financial crisis, have no time for the pieties of traditional political discourse"; our article on them talks about their "
left-wing politics that eschews civility in order to convey a left-wing populist message". These seem to be in general agreement: is there a disconnect between them, and if so, what would be a better thing to say? jp× g 18:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
blackpilledmeans?
and the doomer's "blackpilled despair" combines with spending "too much (...)", combined?
is combined. Editoneer ( talk) 06:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
eclectic, what is ecletic?
Wint
In the shown example, pointing directions at the audience isn't encyclopedic.
have described as Extremely Online, have been?
You can argue the changes at any time, good luck. Editoneer ( talk) 17:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
and 2020 campaign, I don't feel is grammatically correct without some "the". But I consider this can be hotfixed, so all the progress is done, I'm putting it in second opinion. Editoneer ( talk) 14:01, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Generally an article's capitalization style should be reviewed with respect to WP:NCCAPS and MOS:CAPS. Since sources don't usually cap "extremely online" (when they use it in a sentence in the sense meant by this article), we should be using lowercase in Wikipedia. I realize JPxG disagrees, but the open RM suggests that this should have been fixed before this could be a Good Article (caps for emphasis). But Editoneer already flipped that bit, it appears, so we're addressing it in arrears. Dicklyon ( talk) 23:29, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Editoneer ( talk · contribs) 10:41, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Events and phenomena can themselves be Extremely Online;, I thought you already said so by saying above
a person or subject.
latter half of the 2010s (...) increasing prevalence and notability of Internet phenomena in all areas of life.What made it so relevant now and not pre-latter-half?
Extremely Online people are interested in topics "no normal, healthy person could possibly care about",, did you forget a "that"? And I'll personally object to that, because I believe I'm Extremely Online but I'm not interested in dubious topics. You also didn't use "are described as", and you stated it as a fact.
the Dirtbag Left, a coterie of underemployed and overly online millennials who were radicalised by the Iraq war and the 2008 financial crisis, have no time for the pieties of traditional political discourse"; our article on them talks about their "
left-wing politics that eschews civility in order to convey a left-wing populist message". These seem to be in general agreement: is there a disconnect between them, and if so, what would be a better thing to say? jp× g 18:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
blackpilledmeans?
and the doomer's "blackpilled despair" combines with spending "too much (...)", combined?
is combined. Editoneer ( talk) 06:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
eclectic, what is ecletic?
Wint
In the shown example, pointing directions at the audience isn't encyclopedic.
have described as Extremely Online, have been?
You can argue the changes at any time, good luck. Editoneer ( talk) 17:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
and 2020 campaign, I don't feel is grammatically correct without some "the". But I consider this can be hotfixed, so all the progress is done, I'm putting it in second opinion. Editoneer ( talk) 14:01, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Generally an article's capitalization style should be reviewed with respect to WP:NCCAPS and MOS:CAPS. Since sources don't usually cap "extremely online" (when they use it in a sentence in the sense meant by this article), we should be using lowercase in Wikipedia. I realize JPxG disagrees, but the open RM suggests that this should have been fixed before this could be a Good Article (caps for emphasis). But Editoneer already flipped that bit, it appears, so we're addressing it in arrears. Dicklyon ( talk) 23:29, 11 May 2021 (UTC)