 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Dynamically inconsistent
Why use a double negation (exponential discounting is not dynamically inconsistent)? I think one can say that exponential discounting is dynamically consistent and still link the article on dynamic inconsistency. Pegasusgr ( talk) 10:01, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
It would be useful to say whether discount rate delta is between 0 and 1 (which I think is the case, but am unsure). -- 194.117.28.118 ( talk) 16:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Dynamically inconsistent
Why use a double negation (exponential discounting is not dynamically inconsistent)? I think one can say that exponential discounting is dynamically consistent and still link the article on dynamic inconsistency. Pegasusgr ( talk) 10:01, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
It would be useful to say whether discount rate delta is between 0 and 1 (which I think is the case, but am unsure). -- 194.117.28.118 ( talk) 16:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)