 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
I'm replacing this page with a redirect to Electrical equipment in hazardous areas (EEIHA). The content of the page currently and for years is almost entirely a duplicate of NEMA enclosure types. A good deal of what's here is in facxt not even related to explosion-proofing. A lot of it reads like it was lifted from marketing material - "these enclosures are ideal for". What little isn't duplicated at the NEMA page, is duplicated at EEIHA. Currently explosion proof also lead here, so I'm sending the lot of it to EEIHA, since that provides a larger context. I will be introducing some content at EEIHA to better address "explosion-proof" as well, and make sure the NEMA enclosures page gets linked. — DragonHawk ( talk| hist) 14:41, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
| It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
I'm replacing this page with a redirect to Electrical equipment in hazardous areas (EEIHA). The content of the page currently and for years is almost entirely a duplicate of NEMA enclosure types. A good deal of what's here is in facxt not even related to explosion-proofing. A lot of it reads like it was lifted from marketing material - "these enclosures are ideal for". What little isn't duplicated at the NEMA page, is duplicated at EEIHA. Currently explosion proof also lead here, so I'm sending the lot of it to EEIHA, since that provides a larger context. I will be introducing some content at EEIHA to better address "explosion-proof" as well, and make sure the NEMA enclosures page gets linked. — DragonHawk ( talk| hist) 14:41, 31 July 2020 (UTC)