This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Russian apartment bombings conspiracy theories's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "guardian.co.uk":
Reference named "wolvesofislam":
{{
cite book}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(
help){{
cite book}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(
help)Reference named "Kommersant2002-12-10":
Reference named "Satter":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
There is another theory about Ryazan bombing that proposed by Yulia Latynina. According to this theory FSB orchestrated this bombing just to prevent it and pretend that they control the situation and can protect people from bombing. I think we should write section about this version because it has differences with Litvinenko/Trepashkin's version in reasons for organizing bombing. reference (rus): [1]
At the risk of being tedious, nothing has occurred since the publication of my "Spectator" article in October 2002 ( http://www.spectator.co.uk/spectator/thisweek/10496/getting-away-with-murder.thtml) to change my opinion that the bombing campaign of 1999 was the work of the Russian FSB and that General Patrushev knew about it. One observable development however is the emergence of commentators whose main purpose seems consistently to be to rubbish views which are critical of the Russian hierarchy and who seem, therefore, to be an agency of internet protagonists whose objectivity is to be considered questionable. I do not, of course, mean to imply any criticism of respectably accredited academics. I would be interested to know what others think about this. - Jeremy Putley December 30, 2009 ¬¬¬¬ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.225.134 ( talk) 07:27, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
This is one of the worst articles I've seen on Wikipedia. It is an English article written by people who clearly don't understand the English language. You don't even need to read a word of it to know that; Just the nonsensical title tells the reader what they are in for.-- 208.127.100.74 ( talk) 11:04, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 11 external links on Explanation attempts for the Russian apartment bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:07, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 12 external links on Explanation attempts for the Russian apartment bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.friendsofmccain.com/news/dspnews.cfm?id=81When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:07, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Asking since there was some activity here... Should we merge content of this page to main article on this subject and redirect? I do not mind. My very best wishes ( talk) 19:49, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Russian apartment bombings conspiracy theories's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "guardian.co.uk":
Reference named "wolvesofislam":
{{
cite book}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(
help){{
cite book}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(
help)Reference named "Kommersant2002-12-10":
Reference named "Satter":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
There is another theory about Ryazan bombing that proposed by Yulia Latynina. According to this theory FSB orchestrated this bombing just to prevent it and pretend that they control the situation and can protect people from bombing. I think we should write section about this version because it has differences with Litvinenko/Trepashkin's version in reasons for organizing bombing. reference (rus): [1]
At the risk of being tedious, nothing has occurred since the publication of my "Spectator" article in October 2002 ( http://www.spectator.co.uk/spectator/thisweek/10496/getting-away-with-murder.thtml) to change my opinion that the bombing campaign of 1999 was the work of the Russian FSB and that General Patrushev knew about it. One observable development however is the emergence of commentators whose main purpose seems consistently to be to rubbish views which are critical of the Russian hierarchy and who seem, therefore, to be an agency of internet protagonists whose objectivity is to be considered questionable. I do not, of course, mean to imply any criticism of respectably accredited academics. I would be interested to know what others think about this. - Jeremy Putley December 30, 2009 ¬¬¬¬ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.225.134 ( talk) 07:27, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
This is one of the worst articles I've seen on Wikipedia. It is an English article written by people who clearly don't understand the English language. You don't even need to read a word of it to know that; Just the nonsensical title tells the reader what they are in for.-- 208.127.100.74 ( talk) 11:04, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 11 external links on Explanation attempts for the Russian apartment bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:07, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 12 external links on Explanation attempts for the Russian apartment bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.friendsofmccain.com/news/dspnews.cfm?id=81When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:07, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Asking since there was some activity here... Should we merge content of this page to main article on this subject and redirect? I do not mind. My very best wishes ( talk) 19:49, 13 September 2017 (UTC)