This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Ex-clay is the word the industry uses for Expanded Clay, while Leca is a brand name of Expanded Clay.
In my opinion this page has no relevance and should be removed. Also, the information in the article is incomplete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leca67 ( talk • contribs)
The part in italics isn't clear, "To make the exclay, toxic residues such as used oils and all kinds of petroleum gas oils are being burned which makes residues detached while mixing with liquids." Nishaca ( talk) 18:30, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
While I realize this is a generic product, the article is certainly written like an advert. From the tone of it, this stuff is the perfect material for numerous applications. However, there are other materials used for those same applications. Why? Clearly there are benefits of some kind in some applications. - SummerPhD ( talk) 21:18, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Under Characteristics, the article claims 'moisture impermeable'. I don't believe that is true and I see no evidence in the article to back up the claim.
http://www.netweber.co.uk/fileadmin/user_upload/Leca_UK/Technical_Documents/Moisture_Content.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.97.62.77 ( talk) 21:05, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Someone had confused expanded clay aggregate with expansive clay. In the process of fixing the latter article, I deleted a section, which might be useful in this article. Text follows:
I don't have time to evaluate the text or the reference to see if they're any good, though it does look like duplicates stuff already in the article. Argyriou (talk) 21:12, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
References
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Ex-clay is the word the industry uses for Expanded Clay, while Leca is a brand name of Expanded Clay.
In my opinion this page has no relevance and should be removed. Also, the information in the article is incomplete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leca67 ( talk • contribs)
The part in italics isn't clear, "To make the exclay, toxic residues such as used oils and all kinds of petroleum gas oils are being burned which makes residues detached while mixing with liquids." Nishaca ( talk) 18:30, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
While I realize this is a generic product, the article is certainly written like an advert. From the tone of it, this stuff is the perfect material for numerous applications. However, there are other materials used for those same applications. Why? Clearly there are benefits of some kind in some applications. - SummerPhD ( talk) 21:18, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Under Characteristics, the article claims 'moisture impermeable'. I don't believe that is true and I see no evidence in the article to back up the claim.
http://www.netweber.co.uk/fileadmin/user_upload/Leca_UK/Technical_Documents/Moisture_Content.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.97.62.77 ( talk) 21:05, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Someone had confused expanded clay aggregate with expansive clay. In the process of fixing the latter article, I deleted a section, which might be useful in this article. Text follows:
I don't have time to evaluate the text or the reference to see if they're any good, though it does look like duplicates stuff already in the article. Argyriou (talk) 21:12, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
References