This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Notability, advertising, and references
I added the templates importance, ad, and unreferenced because:
Phrases like "This demo was convincing enough" are opinion. If they're only the author's opinion, they should be removed; otherwise they should be cited. This whole article blatantly contradicts
WP:SOAP.
It also doesn't seem notable. I vote for deletion unless its notability is established and someone is familiar enough with the band to fix these issues.
dmyersturnbull ⇒
talk03:58, 26 December 2008 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Notability, advertising, and references
I added the templates importance, ad, and unreferenced because:
Phrases like "This demo was convincing enough" are opinion. If they're only the author's opinion, they should be removed; otherwise they should be cited. This whole article blatantly contradicts
WP:SOAP.
It also doesn't seem notable. I vote for deletion unless its notability is established and someone is familiar enough with the band to fix these issues.
dmyersturnbull ⇒
talk03:58, 26 December 2008 (UTC)reply
