This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lancashire and Cumbria Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why is this called a viaduct rather than an aqueduct? Saga City ( talk) 16:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Good question. I moved the page to the right title. the wub "?!" 15:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Hello, I just took some photographs of the aqueduct and have uploaded the best one, I created the image and desire no rights —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjosephjones ( talk • contribs) 14:47, 28 November 2009 (UTC) reply

I have also uploaded to the commons an image from the opposite side, named Ewood_Aqueduct_2.jpg if somebody could consider incorporating it. Like I said I want nothing for the images —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjosephjones ( talk • contribs) 15:17, 28 November 2009 (UTC) reply