 | This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Evolution (Anastacia album) Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Evolution (Anastacia album) |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 9 October 2018. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
This article was originally created in lieu of the absorbent amount of grammar/spelling errors and fan editing. At that time, I could have easily improved the contents of the article, however, a redirect was the quickest option available. By the time I was available to work on the article, it was already completed by a different editor. For this reason, I feel the article should stand as it. Reviewing the history of the article, I do not understand this reasoning for a revert/redirect after the article has been improved. Touring has become more prominent in the music industry versus 20 years ago. Given the policy as it stands, Wikipedia would need to remove 57% of the tour related articles. There are very few things that make an tour stand out besides revenue. I don't get this lackadaisical approach to policy adherence; turning a blind eye to some while being adamant about others. Bottom line: there has been no significant argument for a redirect of the article. Itsbydesign ( talk) 21:35, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
|
| This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Evolution (Anastacia album) Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Evolution (Anastacia album) |
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 9 October 2018. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
This article was originally created in lieu of the absorbent amount of grammar/spelling errors and fan editing. At that time, I could have easily improved the contents of the article, however, a redirect was the quickest option available. By the time I was available to work on the article, it was already completed by a different editor. For this reason, I feel the article should stand as it. Reviewing the history of the article, I do not understand this reasoning for a revert/redirect after the article has been improved. Touring has become more prominent in the music industry versus 20 years ago. Given the policy as it stands, Wikipedia would need to remove 57% of the tour related articles. There are very few things that make an tour stand out besides revenue. I don't get this lackadaisical approach to policy adherence; turning a blind eye to some while being adamant about others. Bottom line: there has been no significant argument for a redirect of the article. Itsbydesign ( talk) 21:35, 10 December 2018 (UTC)