This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Everything article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on April 7, 2024. The result of the discussion was WP:SNOW keep. |
![]() | A fact from Everything appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 1 April 2009 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
These sources are pretty poor - we need more than an author's name.- Wafulz ( talk) 12:58, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
"Everything could be you or me, it may be the world, the universe, the solar system, all physical objects and sometimes also all abstract objects. It is contrasted with nothing."
not exactly the most scholarly tone, is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.225.171.137 ( talk) 21:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
the smallest unit of atomics is a rainbow bubble. it encompasses all elements and colours. insane theory is linke to the everything story along with potential theory. we beleive insane theory absolves everyone from blame because we have all been every infinite possibility,potential. evil is insane. we all have moments of insanity and we all have moments of love. if we realise self responsibility and that all our ancestors are related and have been so from the begining we will realise we have been hitler,stalin, princess di,mother teresa. venus. we have all been equally good and bad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.176.229.154 ( talk) 13:49, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
You mean liek the whole thing?! Everything?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.24.135 ( talk) 15:33, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
"Everything" isn't really a philosophical concept of any worth. There are Sartre's Totalisations and the like but the actual concept that receives some traction in the tradition is Nothingness, so put that in the lede. 72.228.177.92 ( talk) 17:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
I'm tempted to nominate this article for deletion on the basis of the implicit claim that everything is notable. Jack N. Stock ( talk) 03:34, 17 December 2017 (UTC) Everything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.83.102.139 ( talk) 01:37, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Everything article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on April 7, 2024. The result of the discussion was WP:SNOW keep. |
![]() | A fact from Everything appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 1 April 2009 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
These sources are pretty poor - we need more than an author's name.- Wafulz ( talk) 12:58, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
"Everything could be you or me, it may be the world, the universe, the solar system, all physical objects and sometimes also all abstract objects. It is contrasted with nothing."
not exactly the most scholarly tone, is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.225.171.137 ( talk) 21:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
the smallest unit of atomics is a rainbow bubble. it encompasses all elements and colours. insane theory is linke to the everything story along with potential theory. we beleive insane theory absolves everyone from blame because we have all been every infinite possibility,potential. evil is insane. we all have moments of insanity and we all have moments of love. if we realise self responsibility and that all our ancestors are related and have been so from the begining we will realise we have been hitler,stalin, princess di,mother teresa. venus. we have all been equally good and bad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.176.229.154 ( talk) 13:49, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
You mean liek the whole thing?! Everything?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.24.135 ( talk) 15:33, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
"Everything" isn't really a philosophical concept of any worth. There are Sartre's Totalisations and the like but the actual concept that receives some traction in the tradition is Nothingness, so put that in the lede. 72.228.177.92 ( talk) 17:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
I'm tempted to nominate this article for deletion on the basis of the implicit claim that everything is notable. Jack N. Stock ( talk) 03:34, 17 December 2017 (UTC) Everything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.83.102.139 ( talk) 01:37, 2 July 2022 (UTC)