![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | → | Archive 20 |
I see someone (who has not been involved in this discussion) decided to specifically refrence BoB in this section, Normally, I would have removed that, but given the intensive discussion on the whole subject, I thought I'd ask first. I don't feel that a specific reference to BoB is appropiate here. The reference seems more like an attack than an encyclopedia article. Mdlutz ( talk) 16:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
I think if the New York times sees fit to at least mention BoB when describing this, [1] they are worth citing in this particular section. I understand that the NYT is not an encyclopedia and is bound by a different set of guidelines, but it is a US publication of note and specific mention in an article about EvE there would denote siginificance of at least mentioning BoB by name.-- Wootonius ( talk) 20:11, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
I just watched EVE TV's recording of Oveur's talk at the Fanfest and got confused by Oveur saying that 5 ship classes will be introduced with Trinity. I thought that it will be the four that we've already got in the article: cruisers (Heavy Interdictors), frigates (Electronic Attack Ships) and two sets of battleships (Black Ops, designed for covert operations and Marauders, designed for long-range deployment). However at 11m 39s on the video Oveur gives an overview of 5 classes - the fifth being freighters, namely Jump Freighters.
A few days before the Fanfest CCP Fendahl posted a blog post in which he said that "Trinity introduces four new classes of Tech II combat ships." Did I misread the emphasis of this sentence? Maybe it's supposed to be like "four new classes of Tech II combat ships" (which doesn't say anything about the number of non-combat ships). Am I missing something obvious? I've got the feeling that I do. How many ship classes does Trinity add?
Aexus 23:26, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I just watched that video and I think Oveur mentions Marauder Battleships twice. I think there are only 20 new ships (5 new classes of ships with 4 ships in each class) -- Wootonius ( talk) 23:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Was linked in this page today and since I knew it would eventually be nominated for deletion I got the ball rolling: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guiding Hand Social Club. It might be notable to keep; my opinion is already posted. What are your opinions? Alatari ( talk) 06:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
From the article: On February 9, 2007, one EVE Online developer was found guilty of providing his in-game corporation, Band of Brothers, with six blueprints.. Isn't Band of Brothers an alliance, not a corporation? Arthena (talk) 17:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
I have requested semi-protection for this article. Apparently the last time the article was semi-protected it hasn't motivated the anomymous user(s) to register an account and paticipate in the discussion. Let's see how it develops this time.
--
Aexus (
talk)
13:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
DMacks just semi-protected the article - indefinetely as it seems.
--
Aexus (
talk)
21:00, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | → | Archive 20 |
I see someone (who has not been involved in this discussion) decided to specifically refrence BoB in this section, Normally, I would have removed that, but given the intensive discussion on the whole subject, I thought I'd ask first. I don't feel that a specific reference to BoB is appropiate here. The reference seems more like an attack than an encyclopedia article. Mdlutz ( talk) 16:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
I think if the New York times sees fit to at least mention BoB when describing this, [1] they are worth citing in this particular section. I understand that the NYT is not an encyclopedia and is bound by a different set of guidelines, but it is a US publication of note and specific mention in an article about EvE there would denote siginificance of at least mentioning BoB by name.-- Wootonius ( talk) 20:11, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
I just watched EVE TV's recording of Oveur's talk at the Fanfest and got confused by Oveur saying that 5 ship classes will be introduced with Trinity. I thought that it will be the four that we've already got in the article: cruisers (Heavy Interdictors), frigates (Electronic Attack Ships) and two sets of battleships (Black Ops, designed for covert operations and Marauders, designed for long-range deployment). However at 11m 39s on the video Oveur gives an overview of 5 classes - the fifth being freighters, namely Jump Freighters.
A few days before the Fanfest CCP Fendahl posted a blog post in which he said that "Trinity introduces four new classes of Tech II combat ships." Did I misread the emphasis of this sentence? Maybe it's supposed to be like "four new classes of Tech II combat ships" (which doesn't say anything about the number of non-combat ships). Am I missing something obvious? I've got the feeling that I do. How many ship classes does Trinity add?
Aexus 23:26, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I just watched that video and I think Oveur mentions Marauder Battleships twice. I think there are only 20 new ships (5 new classes of ships with 4 ships in each class) -- Wootonius ( talk) 23:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Was linked in this page today and since I knew it would eventually be nominated for deletion I got the ball rolling: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guiding Hand Social Club. It might be notable to keep; my opinion is already posted. What are your opinions? Alatari ( talk) 06:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
From the article: On February 9, 2007, one EVE Online developer was found guilty of providing his in-game corporation, Band of Brothers, with six blueprints.. Isn't Band of Brothers an alliance, not a corporation? Arthena (talk) 17:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
I have requested semi-protection for this article. Apparently the last time the article was semi-protected it hasn't motivated the anomymous user(s) to register an account and paticipate in the discussion. Let's see how it develops this time.
--
Aexus (
talk)
13:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
DMacks just semi-protected the article - indefinetely as it seems.
--
Aexus (
talk)
21:00, 11 January 2008 (UTC)