From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
SCB '92 (
talk •
contribs •
count)
21:09, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
reply
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- "three year later" should be "years"
- B.
MoS compliance for
lead,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
lists:
- no problems here
- Is it factually accurate and
verifiable?
- A.
References to sources:
- no problems here
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- no problems here
- C.
No original research:
- no problems here
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- no problems here
- B. Focused:
- no problems here
- Is it
neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- no problems here
- Is it stable?
- No
edit wars, etc:
- no problems here
- Does it contain
images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales:
- no problems here
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
suitable captions:
- The image File:List of churches of the Evangelical Missionary Federation.jpg should be moved to the right, as it is messing up the next section
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Yeah, brilliant article, it's a pass