Evan Lorne has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Since this character now has an established first name, shouldn't this article be moved to
Evan Lorne?
—wwoods
16:18, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Ok one article has him as a natural carrier, another as gene therapy. Is it actually known? Million_Moments ( talk) 19:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Reviewer: Sanguis Sanies ( talk) 14:35, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Greetings! I've previously reviewed Jeffrey Spender and as there is a rather large backlog under Film and Television I thought I'd help out and review some more.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
"introduced as a recurring character in the season seven episode "Enemy Mine", " season seven of what? SG-1 or Atlantis? Done
"Throughout the series, it has been speculated by fans that he is second-in-command of Atlantis." typically the lead doesn't need CITEs if the claim is supported by information in the article proper, however this has no supporting claim, so either needs a CITE here, or expanded (and CITEd) in the rest of the article. Done
"but the origins of his having the ATA gene are unknown." could do with a rewrite. Done
"that the Replicators take the form of," Done
DoneI've added {{ fact}} tags to all claims needing a CITE, other than that no major problems.
Done The first and second sentences need CITEs, particularly the direct quotes.
Done "Many critics have noted Smith's strong fanbase." And these critics can be CITEd?
Done "They've been known for following his work from Battlestar Galactica to The 4400 and Stargate Atlantis." Boy is this a bad sentence... it reads like WP:POV and WP:FANCRUFT and has no CITE stating who "They" are, or that "they" have been following them for all the three series mentioned. This is going to be quite difficult to CITE so removing it is fine.
Done As stated here it needs to be better clarified who was doing what.
Done Can CITE 9 be templated using {{ cite news}}?
Done can CITE 10 be link to the direct post?
Evan Lorne has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Since this character now has an established first name, shouldn't this article be moved to
Evan Lorne?
—wwoods
16:18, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Ok one article has him as a natural carrier, another as gene therapy. Is it actually known? Million_Moments ( talk) 19:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Reviewer: Sanguis Sanies ( talk) 14:35, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Greetings! I've previously reviewed Jeffrey Spender and as there is a rather large backlog under Film and Television I thought I'd help out and review some more.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
"introduced as a recurring character in the season seven episode "Enemy Mine", " season seven of what? SG-1 or Atlantis? Done
"Throughout the series, it has been speculated by fans that he is second-in-command of Atlantis." typically the lead doesn't need CITEs if the claim is supported by information in the article proper, however this has no supporting claim, so either needs a CITE here, or expanded (and CITEd) in the rest of the article. Done
"but the origins of his having the ATA gene are unknown." could do with a rewrite. Done
"that the Replicators take the form of," Done
DoneI've added {{ fact}} tags to all claims needing a CITE, other than that no major problems.
Done The first and second sentences need CITEs, particularly the direct quotes.
Done "Many critics have noted Smith's strong fanbase." And these critics can be CITEd?
Done "They've been known for following his work from Battlestar Galactica to The 4400 and Stargate Atlantis." Boy is this a bad sentence... it reads like WP:POV and WP:FANCRUFT and has no CITE stating who "They" are, or that "they" have been following them for all the three series mentioned. This is going to be quite difficult to CITE so removing it is fine.
Done As stated here it needs to be better clarified who was doing what.
Done Can CITE 9 be templated using {{ cite news}}?
Done can CITE 10 be link to the direct post?