The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: JPxG ( talk · contribs) 02:39, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
I'll do my best!
jp×
g
02:39, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Okay, for this one I will use the same scale as I do for all my reviews.
Most of the GAs I've reviewed have been about things like industrial chemicals or baseball players from the 1880s. This one, on the other hand, seems to have been a quite controversial figure who was the subject of politically motivated accusations of a serious act of terrorism. Also, most of the sources are in another language. Fun! At least it isn't a BLP.
Then Guardian features editor Ian Katz asserted in 2004 that "it is no secret we are a centre-left newspaper".[174] In 2008, Guardian columnist Jackie Ashley said that editorial contributors were a mix of "right-of-centre libertarians, greens, Blairites, Brownites, Labourite but less enthusiastic Brownites, etc," and that the newspaper was "clearly left of centre and vaguely progressive".
at first suspected of hiding the perpetrators of the bombing, she was subsequently accused of complicity in ETA's December 20, 1973, terrorist assassination of Spain's then prime minister and Franco supporter Admiral Luis Carrero Blanco". The article, meanwhile, seems murky in comparison: "
Sympathetic to the Basque cause, the book was one of the reasons which led to Forest being imprisoned in the same year for alleged complicity in the Cafetería Rolando bombing in Madrid". I don't know what "complicity" means in the Encyclopedia; however, writing a book and assassinating a guy seem like quite different things to be accused of.
Such practices have helped her family to eliminate to a high degree the authority principle that has ruled the bourgeois family". This isn't attributed, it's just said in the encyclopedia's voice; I am not sure that the neutrality of this source can be assumed.
Her complicity was finally made explicit with publication of Operacion Ogro [...] this edition recreates the episode carried out by the Basque commandos". Still not sure what "complicity" means. Was she one of the commandos, or what?
ETA veía cómo aquel impactante suceso podía aún rentabilizarse y dar a conocer más ampliamente la lucha del pueblo vasco. No era mala la idea de relatar en forma de libro los pormenores de la operación, por lo que la organizacion pidio a Eva Forest, colaboradora activa de la resistencia vasca, que describeria en forma escrita aquel suceso.So, okay, according to this book she was a colaboradora activa de la resistencia vasca, asked to write this book after the fact, and not involved in it. It seems that we should say that it says this. However, one concern with this source is that I looked up the author (Iker Casanova) and it seems that he was in prison from 2000 to 2011 for being a member of an armed gang related to ETA: "
fue condenado a 11 años de prisión por pertenencia a banda armada dentro del sumario 18/98 seguido contra varias organizaciones del entorno de ETA". This might not be a terribly reliable source for anything other than her having been approached by ETA to write a book, and maybe not even then.
En los años cincuenta, Eva Forest fue una activa militante antifranquista" which I guess depends on what we take
militanteto mean in English, but seems to suggest she took an active role in the goings-on of ETA.
Voy a atenderla y yo creo que Eva Forest no tuvo intervención directa, consciente y lo que en Derecho Penal se llama punible, es decir, con las condiciones esenciales para que haya lo que se llama el dolo, un conocimiento perfecto de la acción, una voluntad de ejecutar y una acumulación de actos necesarios y suficientes.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: JPxG ( talk · contribs) 02:39, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
I'll do my best!
jp×
g
02:39, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Okay, for this one I will use the same scale as I do for all my reviews.
Most of the GAs I've reviewed have been about things like industrial chemicals or baseball players from the 1880s. This one, on the other hand, seems to have been a quite controversial figure who was the subject of politically motivated accusations of a serious act of terrorism. Also, most of the sources are in another language. Fun! At least it isn't a BLP.
Then Guardian features editor Ian Katz asserted in 2004 that "it is no secret we are a centre-left newspaper".[174] In 2008, Guardian columnist Jackie Ashley said that editorial contributors were a mix of "right-of-centre libertarians, greens, Blairites, Brownites, Labourite but less enthusiastic Brownites, etc," and that the newspaper was "clearly left of centre and vaguely progressive".
at first suspected of hiding the perpetrators of the bombing, she was subsequently accused of complicity in ETA's December 20, 1973, terrorist assassination of Spain's then prime minister and Franco supporter Admiral Luis Carrero Blanco". The article, meanwhile, seems murky in comparison: "
Sympathetic to the Basque cause, the book was one of the reasons which led to Forest being imprisoned in the same year for alleged complicity in the Cafetería Rolando bombing in Madrid". I don't know what "complicity" means in the Encyclopedia; however, writing a book and assassinating a guy seem like quite different things to be accused of.
Such practices have helped her family to eliminate to a high degree the authority principle that has ruled the bourgeois family". This isn't attributed, it's just said in the encyclopedia's voice; I am not sure that the neutrality of this source can be assumed.
Her complicity was finally made explicit with publication of Operacion Ogro [...] this edition recreates the episode carried out by the Basque commandos". Still not sure what "complicity" means. Was she one of the commandos, or what?
ETA veía cómo aquel impactante suceso podía aún rentabilizarse y dar a conocer más ampliamente la lucha del pueblo vasco. No era mala la idea de relatar en forma de libro los pormenores de la operación, por lo que la organizacion pidio a Eva Forest, colaboradora activa de la resistencia vasca, que describeria en forma escrita aquel suceso.So, okay, according to this book she was a colaboradora activa de la resistencia vasca, asked to write this book after the fact, and not involved in it. It seems that we should say that it says this. However, one concern with this source is that I looked up the author (Iker Casanova) and it seems that he was in prison from 2000 to 2011 for being a member of an armed gang related to ETA: "
fue condenado a 11 años de prisión por pertenencia a banda armada dentro del sumario 18/98 seguido contra varias organizaciones del entorno de ETA". This might not be a terribly reliable source for anything other than her having been approached by ETA to write a book, and maybe not even then.
En los años cincuenta, Eva Forest fue una activa militante antifranquista" which I guess depends on what we take
militanteto mean in English, but seems to suggest she took an active role in the goings-on of ETA.
Voy a atenderla y yo creo que Eva Forest no tuvo intervención directa, consciente y lo que en Derecho Penal se llama punible, es decir, con las condiciones esenciales para que haya lo que se llama el dolo, un conocimiento perfecto de la acción, una voluntad de ejecutar y una acumulación de actos necesarios y suficientes.