This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
European Union鈥揟urkey Customs Union article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources:聽 Google ( books聽路 news聽路 scholar聽路 free images聽路 WP聽refs)聽路 FENS聽路 JSTOR聽路 TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Turkey may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This is more about the accession process in general than the Customs Union. It doesn't mention that, in agriculture, Turkey has far greater access to the EU market than EU producers have to the Turkish market: 70% of agricultural produce is tariff-free and fruit and vegetables are virtually tariff-free on the way out of Turkey. 鈥擯receding unsigned comment added by 86.137.16.238 ( talk) 11:34, 7 September 2007 (UTC) I Agree. Whole artice is written from a EU view. It should be marked as not neutral. -- mko ( talk) 15:46, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
could you please tell me what my duty free allowances are traveling from the turkey to the u.k 鈥擯receding unsigned comment added by 86.1.245.206 ( talk) 14:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
I agree that this entry appears to be on a different subject, Turkey's accession to the EU, and even there it is riddled with inaccuracies, out of date and misleading. The EU-Turkey customs union was not in any official way intended as a "first step" toward EU membership for Turkey, and the EU has not started the accession process with Turkey as the entry states. 鈥擯receding unsigned comment added by Davique ( talk 鈥 contribs) 13:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
This article is strongly biased against the Customs Union. I am very suspicious of the figures listed. The fact that the Turkish GDP has more than doubled since the establishment might be worth mentioning. Comparing it to the Ottoman capitulations is ridiculous and more than a little offensive. Rob Morris 22 May 2013 鈥 Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.45.69.194 ( talk) 08:22, 22 May 2013 (UTC) I cleaned it up a bit.
This article is strongly biased against the customs union. It's not an encyclopedia article but a debating article 鈥 Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.149.241.163 ( talk) 01:34, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Although the statements in this section may well be cited on a Turkish source, I have to question whether that source is a reliable one. The text of the Treaty contains nothing remotely to support the inferences it makes. For now, I have tagged them as "not in citatation given" but unless someone can come forward by the end of November with a credible reason to keep the section, I shall delete it. Xref also anon ed's comments earlier. -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 20:28, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Cite error: There are <ref聽group=lower-alpha>
tags聽or {{efn}}
templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}}
template聽or {{notelist}}
template (see the
help page).
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
European Union鈥揟urkey Customs Union article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources:聽 Google ( books聽路 news聽路 scholar聽路 free images聽路 WP聽refs)聽路 FENS聽路 JSTOR聽路 TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Turkey may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This is more about the accession process in general than the Customs Union. It doesn't mention that, in agriculture, Turkey has far greater access to the EU market than EU producers have to the Turkish market: 70% of agricultural produce is tariff-free and fruit and vegetables are virtually tariff-free on the way out of Turkey. 鈥擯receding unsigned comment added by 86.137.16.238 ( talk) 11:34, 7 September 2007 (UTC) I Agree. Whole artice is written from a EU view. It should be marked as not neutral. -- mko ( talk) 15:46, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
could you please tell me what my duty free allowances are traveling from the turkey to the u.k 鈥擯receding unsigned comment added by 86.1.245.206 ( talk) 14:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
I agree that this entry appears to be on a different subject, Turkey's accession to the EU, and even there it is riddled with inaccuracies, out of date and misleading. The EU-Turkey customs union was not in any official way intended as a "first step" toward EU membership for Turkey, and the EU has not started the accession process with Turkey as the entry states. 鈥擯receding unsigned comment added by Davique ( talk 鈥 contribs) 13:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
This article is strongly biased against the Customs Union. I am very suspicious of the figures listed. The fact that the Turkish GDP has more than doubled since the establishment might be worth mentioning. Comparing it to the Ottoman capitulations is ridiculous and more than a little offensive. Rob Morris 22 May 2013 鈥 Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.45.69.194 ( talk) 08:22, 22 May 2013 (UTC) I cleaned it up a bit.
This article is strongly biased against the customs union. It's not an encyclopedia article but a debating article 鈥 Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.149.241.163 ( talk) 01:34, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Although the statements in this section may well be cited on a Turkish source, I have to question whether that source is a reliable one. The text of the Treaty contains nothing remotely to support the inferences it makes. For now, I have tagged them as "not in citatation given" but unless someone can come forward by the end of November with a credible reason to keep the section, I shall delete it. Xref also anon ed's comments earlier. -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 20:28, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Cite error: There are <ref聽group=lower-alpha>
tags聽or {{efn}}
templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}}
template聽or {{notelist}}
template (see the
help page).