This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
European Service Module article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Summaries of this article appear in Automated Transfer Vehicle and Orion (spacecraft). |
Nothing in article at moment explains change to use the European design. GraemeLeggett ( talk) 20:43, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Could give some detail on the Crew Module Adapter which houses/hosts the umbilical connection. - Rod57 ( talk) 16:49, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
The Orion Service Module includes the CMA. The European Service Module is the European part only. Hektor ( talk) 12:16, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
"Last week at the Airbus integration hall in Bremen, Germany, technicians installed the last radiator on the European Service Module for NASA’s Orion spacecraft marking the module’s finished integration. … Once complete the service module will be packed and flown to NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida, USA. Orion’s solar wings will be shipped separately, also from Bremen. In the USA the module will be stacked together with NASA’s Crew Module Adaptor and Crew Module, the first time the complete spacecraft will be on display." WatcherZero ( talk) 18:51, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
There are 6 components of the Service Module (according to the diagram) : Crew Module Adapter (including umbilical), European Service Module, 3 curved panels, Spacecraft adapter. Lockheed-Martin are building 5 of them. Since Orion Service Module just redirects here we could describe and detail (eg masses) all 6 in this article ? but planning eventually to populate Orion Service Module ? - Rod57 ( talk) 10:22, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
(Removed RfC) Should this article use American or British English? – Jadebenn ( talk · contribs · subpages) 11:16, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Current status: Pro AE: Soumyabrata, mfb, Fcrary, GraemeLeggett; pro BE: - ; couldn't find a clear statement in favor of one: Jadebenn, Deacon Vorbis, Tercer, Redrose64 (only an administrative comment). -- mfb ( talk) 08:46, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
[1] says 1.8 km/s (but was that before the ESM) ?
[2] says 1346 m/s (with another 241 m/s from the capsule after separation). Too much like OR - what do NASA say ? -
Rod57 (
talk) 23:35, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
>Artemis 1, first major milestone in Nasa's Artemis program to set food again on the moon and explore moon-to-mars missions planned to launch August 29th 2022, will carry the ESM in two low fly-by orbits around the moon.
Should be "To set food" 212.4.92.81 ( talk) 11:21, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
"1 New Aerojet Orion Main Engine (OME) from ESM-6"
The new Aerojet OME will be first installed on Artemis 7: https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-awards-orion-main-engine-contract-for-future-artemis-missions — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.228.19.95 ( talk) 11:11, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Article says the "surge tanks" in the initial design were for reentry and landing, so presumably they were in the capsule rather than the original-SM. This article should clarify ? - Rod57 ( talk) 12:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
European Service Module article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Summaries of this article appear in Automated Transfer Vehicle and Orion (spacecraft). |
Nothing in article at moment explains change to use the European design. GraemeLeggett ( talk) 20:43, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Could give some detail on the Crew Module Adapter which houses/hosts the umbilical connection. - Rod57 ( talk) 16:49, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
The Orion Service Module includes the CMA. The European Service Module is the European part only. Hektor ( talk) 12:16, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
"Last week at the Airbus integration hall in Bremen, Germany, technicians installed the last radiator on the European Service Module for NASA’s Orion spacecraft marking the module’s finished integration. … Once complete the service module will be packed and flown to NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida, USA. Orion’s solar wings will be shipped separately, also from Bremen. In the USA the module will be stacked together with NASA’s Crew Module Adaptor and Crew Module, the first time the complete spacecraft will be on display." WatcherZero ( talk) 18:51, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
There are 6 components of the Service Module (according to the diagram) : Crew Module Adapter (including umbilical), European Service Module, 3 curved panels, Spacecraft adapter. Lockheed-Martin are building 5 of them. Since Orion Service Module just redirects here we could describe and detail (eg masses) all 6 in this article ? but planning eventually to populate Orion Service Module ? - Rod57 ( talk) 10:22, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
(Removed RfC) Should this article use American or British English? – Jadebenn ( talk · contribs · subpages) 11:16, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Current status: Pro AE: Soumyabrata, mfb, Fcrary, GraemeLeggett; pro BE: - ; couldn't find a clear statement in favor of one: Jadebenn, Deacon Vorbis, Tercer, Redrose64 (only an administrative comment). -- mfb ( talk) 08:46, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
[1] says 1.8 km/s (but was that before the ESM) ?
[2] says 1346 m/s (with another 241 m/s from the capsule after separation). Too much like OR - what do NASA say ? -
Rod57 (
talk) 23:35, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
>Artemis 1, first major milestone in Nasa's Artemis program to set food again on the moon and explore moon-to-mars missions planned to launch August 29th 2022, will carry the ESM in two low fly-by orbits around the moon.
Should be "To set food" 212.4.92.81 ( talk) 11:21, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
"1 New Aerojet Orion Main Engine (OME) from ESM-6"
The new Aerojet OME will be first installed on Artemis 7: https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-awards-orion-main-engine-contract-for-future-artemis-missions — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.228.19.95 ( talk) 11:11, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Article says the "surge tanks" in the initial design were for reentry and landing, so presumably they were in the capsule rather than the original-SM. This article should clarify ? - Rod57 ( talk) 12:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC)