![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@ HH1978: We currently have very few tertiary sources giving in-depth profiles about EEPA/Advisors and EEPA/Africa. The higher quality the sources, the better the article will be. Unsourced information such as "Moreover, van Reisen has resigned from the Board" cannot be used. Boud ( talk) 23:22, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for raising the EEPA reliability issue. I have been wondering how an international organization be so biased. It appears EEPA is not international at all. I have been reading this timeline and found it too biased towards TPLF, and all those biased information in almost all of the cases come from EEPA. I checked their website and found that they started writing situation report on November 17 2020, few days before the war in Tigray broke. They then stopped writing situation report in August 2021. This the time when TPLF forces entered neighboring regions of Amara and Afar. I read the content of the situation reports, I would say I know when I see one, I can tell you guys these reports are coming out directly from TPLF or TPLF supporters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.137.18.35 (talk) 19:06, 1 January 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.137.18.111 ( talk)
EEPA has at least one case of a misleading use of online sources: see Maryam Ts'iyon massacre#Regina Lynch is not a fourth source. Of course, uncontroversially "reliable sources" are known for misleading reports too. Boud ( talk) 23:51, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
This subject is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethiopia § Reliable sources or not? eritreahub.org, martinplaut.com, eepa.be. Platonk ( talk) 10:43, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@ HH1978: We currently have very few tertiary sources giving in-depth profiles about EEPA/Advisors and EEPA/Africa. The higher quality the sources, the better the article will be. Unsourced information such as "Moreover, van Reisen has resigned from the Board" cannot be used. Boud ( talk) 23:22, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for raising the EEPA reliability issue. I have been wondering how an international organization be so biased. It appears EEPA is not international at all. I have been reading this timeline and found it too biased towards TPLF, and all those biased information in almost all of the cases come from EEPA. I checked their website and found that they started writing situation report on November 17 2020, few days before the war in Tigray broke. They then stopped writing situation report in August 2021. This the time when TPLF forces entered neighboring regions of Amara and Afar. I read the content of the situation reports, I would say I know when I see one, I can tell you guys these reports are coming out directly from TPLF or TPLF supporters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.137.18.35 (talk) 19:06, 1 January 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.137.18.111 ( talk)
EEPA has at least one case of a misleading use of online sources: see Maryam Ts'iyon massacre#Regina Lynch is not a fourth source. Of course, uncontroversially "reliable sources" are known for misleading reports too. Boud ( talk) 23:51, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
This subject is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethiopia § Reliable sources or not? eritreahub.org, martinplaut.com, eepa.be. Platonk ( talk) 10:43, 9 January 2022 (UTC)