I've removed the speedy that had as a a reason 'because it leads to a page which is being made redundant. I'm removing all instances of the disambiguation that lead to the page "European Cup", hence "Europe Cup" isn't needed. Furthermore, "Europe Cup" has no pages which link to it'. I think the nominator is misunderstanding wikipedia convention. Yes, in general we don't link to disambiguation pages but that doesn't make the European Cup page redundant as it's still a very likely search term. Europe Cup while less likely still seems to be a likely search term and as we don't know which cup they'd have searched for we would need to disambig again. As we don't have duplicate pages on wikipedia we need to redirect to the more liekly search term European Cup. In short both European Cup and Europe Cup need to exist as likely search terms and the current way they are is the best way of doing this and is standard wikipedia practice. Dpmuk ( talk) 11:21, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
I've removed the speedy that had as a a reason 'because it leads to a page which is being made redundant. I'm removing all instances of the disambiguation that lead to the page "European Cup", hence "Europe Cup" isn't needed. Furthermore, "Europe Cup" has no pages which link to it'. I think the nominator is misunderstanding wikipedia convention. Yes, in general we don't link to disambiguation pages but that doesn't make the European Cup page redundant as it's still a very likely search term. Europe Cup while less likely still seems to be a likely search term and as we don't know which cup they'd have searched for we would need to disambig again. As we don't have duplicate pages on wikipedia we need to redirect to the more liekly search term European Cup. In short both European Cup and Europe Cup need to exist as likely search terms and the current way they are is the best way of doing this and is standard wikipedia practice. Dpmuk ( talk) 11:21, 5 September 2008 (UTC)