![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
Is there any proof that this is indeed an NGO and not just a website? Are they registered anywhere as a legal entity? Pecher Talk 13:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Can you cite some indication of notability other than "they supported someone else's decision"? A mention in a general newspaper, perhaps? Gazpacho 11:08, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
See here. It's in French but i think Libération will be considered legitimate enough a source. Tazmaniacs
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
Is there any proof that this is indeed an NGO and not just a website? Are they registered anywhere as a legal entity? Pecher Talk 13:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Can you cite some indication of notability other than "they supported someone else's decision"? A mention in a general newspaper, perhaps? Gazpacho 11:08, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
See here. It's in French but i think Libération will be considered legitimate enough a source. Tazmaniacs