This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Although the U.S. cryobot Europa lander is in study, I found nothing linking it to the "Europa Jupiter System Mission". Instead of deleting that section I rendered it "invisible" in case someone does find a reference. Cheers, -- BatteryIncluded ( talk) 22:05, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Is purely hypothetical with very low chance of realization. It is incorrect to lump all four flight systems together, under characterization of being "planned." JEO and JGO are confirmed by the Joint Jupiter Science Definition Team report of January 2009, with a clear time-table of operations (2020-2029). All preliminary planning is going ahead under the assumption that there will be no additional crafts. Let's not be overly optimistic and include any vague suggestion into this article. -- Hatteras ( talk) 06:53, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
This and the other L-class ESA missions will need a rewrite due to recent events however just to be clear, this is ESA's position on the matter. Basically all missions are delayed while they are reformulated to become smaller ESA-only missions (e.g. IXO is now "Athena") and down-selection will now occur at a later date. ChiZeroOne ( talk) 20:43, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
The story about how Juno mission scientists and also Mars mission scientists pushed the Europa mission out of the way is quite a tale, and is an essential part of the topic, that would go well in a new "Controversy" section.
Some patient Internet research will find plenty on the topic. The Planetary Society (a nonprofit) is one good resource on this.
In short, there are plenty of scientists who are very unhappy that any kind of Europa lander mission has been pushed aside for so many years. Especially given that Europa has a 95% confirmed saltwater ocean, and is felt by many to be the number one destination for any search for extraterrestrial life.
Enceladus, another more recently confirmed-Lunar-Ocean exploration target, has also been repeatedly pushed back in favor of other entrenched and very aggressive science research interests.
Writeonandon ( talk) 19:08, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion reminded me, the European-only mission has now been renamed JUICE (JUpiter ICy moon Explorer). [1] ChiZeroOne ( talk) 06:24, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Europa Jupiter System Mission – Laplace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:43, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Although the U.S. cryobot Europa lander is in study, I found nothing linking it to the "Europa Jupiter System Mission". Instead of deleting that section I rendered it "invisible" in case someone does find a reference. Cheers, -- BatteryIncluded ( talk) 22:05, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Is purely hypothetical with very low chance of realization. It is incorrect to lump all four flight systems together, under characterization of being "planned." JEO and JGO are confirmed by the Joint Jupiter Science Definition Team report of January 2009, with a clear time-table of operations (2020-2029). All preliminary planning is going ahead under the assumption that there will be no additional crafts. Let's not be overly optimistic and include any vague suggestion into this article. -- Hatteras ( talk) 06:53, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
This and the other L-class ESA missions will need a rewrite due to recent events however just to be clear, this is ESA's position on the matter. Basically all missions are delayed while they are reformulated to become smaller ESA-only missions (e.g. IXO is now "Athena") and down-selection will now occur at a later date. ChiZeroOne ( talk) 20:43, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
The story about how Juno mission scientists and also Mars mission scientists pushed the Europa mission out of the way is quite a tale, and is an essential part of the topic, that would go well in a new "Controversy" section.
Some patient Internet research will find plenty on the topic. The Planetary Society (a nonprofit) is one good resource on this.
In short, there are plenty of scientists who are very unhappy that any kind of Europa lander mission has been pushed aside for so many years. Especially given that Europa has a 95% confirmed saltwater ocean, and is felt by many to be the number one destination for any search for extraterrestrial life.
Enceladus, another more recently confirmed-Lunar-Ocean exploration target, has also been repeatedly pushed back in favor of other entrenched and very aggressive science research interests.
Writeonandon ( talk) 19:08, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion reminded me, the European-only mission has now been renamed JUICE (JUpiter ICy moon Explorer). [1] ChiZeroOne ( talk) 06:24, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Europa Jupiter System Mission – Laplace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:43, 24 September 2017 (UTC)