This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Euronews article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
RTE is listed as a founder, and later as one of those who joined SOCEMIE in 1997 along with the founders. Obviously a small rewrite or correction of this section is needed, but I don't have the information needed -- garryq 10:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
What happened to this particular program? Did EuroNews discontinue it? -- Denelson 83 23:25, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Euronews was removed from the Canadian Bell ExpressVu service in April 2007. I've been unable to find a published citation for this, but as far as original research goes, I can turn on my receiver and confirm that this is true. ExpressVu has not yet updated its channel lineup file to reflect this change. Mike Doughney ( talk) 20:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
There's also Euronews Radio, so Euronews is not just TV. www..com/radio I was looking for pan-E.U. radio in English for years in my iRadio—yesterday I searched France and found Euronews Radio English. Very important to me! -- Demoiselle Clarisse ( talk) 09:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
It has been brought to my attention that some users have been continiously reverting content from an anonymous contributor, despite the fact that this user sourced his content. I've examined his claims and the source he listed has indeed been used in the intro section of the article for nearly a year now. That the source currently is not yielding a result isn't sufficient grounds for a full removal of this new content -- the website is clearly genuine and a reliable source, and I suggest we give it some time to correct this internal error it seems to be facing at present. At any rate, I see no reason why this content should be removed. DieOfGoodLuck ( talk) 20:06, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
I rarely see anything reported from Greece. -- Leladax ( talk) 16:24, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Now they mention it and very vocal against it in the crisis (being against it is not a norm, e.g. French media is not against it). Something smells fishy here. -- Leladax ( talk) 06:07, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
I would like to see some sources on Euronews's policies regarding the Mideast Conflict, and whether or not people think it is pro-Israel/pro-Palestinian. [1]. ADM ( talk) 08:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Is the programmes section in lowercase for some special reason? 87.219.84.28 ( talk) 00:26, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
I changed the launch date of Euronews because Euronews didn't exist in 1986. It was actually founded in 1992 in Lyon as a European Broadcasting Union initiative by a group of 11 European public broadcasters. -- CTWPerfection ( talk) 00:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Who are the principal authors of this piece?
The majority of the 'references' are to Euronews sources - hardly objective or neutral.
The EU has a track record (see Matthew Elliott et al 'The Great European Rip off')of funding what is essentially propaganda pushed to the market by third parties.
Both the Commission and the parliament pay so called 'independent' producres to produce firndly pieces - that are then placed with compromised outlets like Euronews.
If all this were to be done tansaprently - fair enough. Though tax payers may complain. In fact it is done covertly - as with Euronews.
This article as a whole does not have a neutral point of view and in its assertion that Euronews is akin to a public service broadcaster such as the BBC or PBS is compromising the integrity of genuine public service broadcasters. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Modern Cromwell ( talk • contribs) 14:01, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
18 May 2011. This article continues to promote the idea that the channel is a 'Public service broadcaster' similar to the BBC or PBS.
In fact as noted in my revision it is more akin to 'Russia today' or Iran's State TV. These channels promote a clear Goverment 'Line' with some limited editorial freedom.
Euronews carries no (or almost no) stories unfavourable to the EU. Nothing on curruption. Nothing on the effects of the CAP on non European nations. Nothing on the fact the Union's own auditors have not approved its accounts for the last 13 years.
Thus hardly a 'Public Service'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Modern Cromwell ( talk • contribs) 11:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
This is an independent journalistic investigation by Euractiv
Personal and professional links between Orbán and new Euronews owner!
By Molly Killeen | EURACTIV.com (updated: 5 January. 2022 г.)
Attention: There is no refutation of the information that the Euronews channel is fully or partially controlled and financed by Viktor Orban!
Always double-check this source of information!
″ https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/personal-and-professional-links-between-orban-and-new-euronews-owner/″ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.142.201.116 ( talk) 09:09, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
I am 'Modern Cromwell'. I have remeoved viwer figures from the text.
References supporting them were Euronews documents - hardly neutral. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Modern Cromwell ( talk • contribs) 00:25, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Your comments are the ones that are hardly neutral by calling Euronews a propaganda tool. -- Golstein ( talk) 16:37, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Well when an organisation claims independence but in fact pushes a line and is subsidised by tax payer funds to do so, i think it meets the definition of propaganda. However I accept the word has an emotional impact not consistent with a neutral POV so i am happy not to use it. However whoever is editing this from Euronews keeps insisting that it is a 'Public service broadcaster' when it is not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Modern Cromwell ( talk • contribs) 01:14, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
In an effort to end this discussion Wikipedia's own entry on public service broadcasting containes the following as part of the definition (taken from the UK Broadcasting Research Unit): 'Detachment from vested interests and government in which programming is impartial, and the broadcaster is not be subject to control by advertisers or government.Italic text
Euronews hardly meets this criterion (or indeed a number of others mentioned in the article) and thus cannot be called a Public Service Broadcaster. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Modern Cromwell ( talk • contribs) 01:34, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
I've added cable channels but it does not show up in the template. too many maybe?! -- Pedro ( talk) 14:46, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Subliminal message considering their anti-Israel approach and biased coverage ? Radical-Dreamer ( talk) 12:45, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
There's a slow-motion edit war going on between me (sorry) and an unregistered user who keeps hopping IPs, making communication difficult. For that reason, here's a thread for discussing the issue behind the revert cycle.
I seek the opinions of the community here, for purposes of my own sanity ◦ Trey Maturin 17:49, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved — Amakuru ( talk) 16:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Euronews →
Euronews NBC – NBC bought a 25% stake in Euronews and has renamed the network, Euronews NBC, according to the New York Times.
[1]
References
Thunderbolt.wiki ( talk) 22:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
I think that is a important change than made the article must be uptades. I made some changes already, but I think must be made a all article revision.
I only have two articles reference in spanish, but I think in the next days will be more articles in many languages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fharlock ( talk • contribs) 12:44, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: voluntarily closed by the user and moved when official. I apologize for creating this move request so quickly, but I would like to let you know that I did find a source that says NBCUniversal closed the deal here. When the name change is official, this article can be moved. ( non-admin closure) 2601:8C:4001:DCB9:91C0:B17C:7195:720C ( talk) 20:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Euronews → EuronewsNBC – I believe the purchase by NBCUniversal was completed yesterday. 2601:8C:4001:DCB9:C49:9E5B:672C:A0C9 ( talk) 11:39, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Contesting reason: There is no official source which confirms that the name of the company has also been changed. The official website still reflect EURONEWS. Yashovardhan ( talk) 14:06, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Wait: Please calm down and get out of the "gotta be first to file the scoop!" mindset. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. As noted in the "requested move" discussion of February 20 (just a couple of sections above), we generally follow the "common name" guideline for article titles. In this case the common name is what the channel calls itself. (Note that the article is primarily about the channel, not the company.) The channel and the website are still calling themselves "Euronews" even though the purchase may have been completed. (And by the way, we have not seen a RS confirming that completion.) All editors appreciate other editors who want to help keep the encyclopedia up to date, but being not-a-newspaper we don't need to be up to the minute. As long as this company keeps calling itself simply "Euronews" on their web site, in their logo, in the branding they use on the air, and etc., that's what the article title should be per our P&G. Jeh ( talk) 14:25, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Euronews. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Euronews article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
RTE is listed as a founder, and later as one of those who joined SOCEMIE in 1997 along with the founders. Obviously a small rewrite or correction of this section is needed, but I don't have the information needed -- garryq 10:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
What happened to this particular program? Did EuroNews discontinue it? -- Denelson 83 23:25, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Euronews was removed from the Canadian Bell ExpressVu service in April 2007. I've been unable to find a published citation for this, but as far as original research goes, I can turn on my receiver and confirm that this is true. ExpressVu has not yet updated its channel lineup file to reflect this change. Mike Doughney ( talk) 20:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
There's also Euronews Radio, so Euronews is not just TV. www..com/radio I was looking for pan-E.U. radio in English for years in my iRadio—yesterday I searched France and found Euronews Radio English. Very important to me! -- Demoiselle Clarisse ( talk) 09:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
It has been brought to my attention that some users have been continiously reverting content from an anonymous contributor, despite the fact that this user sourced his content. I've examined his claims and the source he listed has indeed been used in the intro section of the article for nearly a year now. That the source currently is not yielding a result isn't sufficient grounds for a full removal of this new content -- the website is clearly genuine and a reliable source, and I suggest we give it some time to correct this internal error it seems to be facing at present. At any rate, I see no reason why this content should be removed. DieOfGoodLuck ( talk) 20:06, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
I rarely see anything reported from Greece. -- Leladax ( talk) 16:24, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Now they mention it and very vocal against it in the crisis (being against it is not a norm, e.g. French media is not against it). Something smells fishy here. -- Leladax ( talk) 06:07, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
I would like to see some sources on Euronews's policies regarding the Mideast Conflict, and whether or not people think it is pro-Israel/pro-Palestinian. [1]. ADM ( talk) 08:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Is the programmes section in lowercase for some special reason? 87.219.84.28 ( talk) 00:26, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
I changed the launch date of Euronews because Euronews didn't exist in 1986. It was actually founded in 1992 in Lyon as a European Broadcasting Union initiative by a group of 11 European public broadcasters. -- CTWPerfection ( talk) 00:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Who are the principal authors of this piece?
The majority of the 'references' are to Euronews sources - hardly objective or neutral.
The EU has a track record (see Matthew Elliott et al 'The Great European Rip off')of funding what is essentially propaganda pushed to the market by third parties.
Both the Commission and the parliament pay so called 'independent' producres to produce firndly pieces - that are then placed with compromised outlets like Euronews.
If all this were to be done tansaprently - fair enough. Though tax payers may complain. In fact it is done covertly - as with Euronews.
This article as a whole does not have a neutral point of view and in its assertion that Euronews is akin to a public service broadcaster such as the BBC or PBS is compromising the integrity of genuine public service broadcasters. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Modern Cromwell ( talk • contribs) 14:01, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
18 May 2011. This article continues to promote the idea that the channel is a 'Public service broadcaster' similar to the BBC or PBS.
In fact as noted in my revision it is more akin to 'Russia today' or Iran's State TV. These channels promote a clear Goverment 'Line' with some limited editorial freedom.
Euronews carries no (or almost no) stories unfavourable to the EU. Nothing on curruption. Nothing on the effects of the CAP on non European nations. Nothing on the fact the Union's own auditors have not approved its accounts for the last 13 years.
Thus hardly a 'Public Service'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Modern Cromwell ( talk • contribs) 11:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
This is an independent journalistic investigation by Euractiv
Personal and professional links between Orbán and new Euronews owner!
By Molly Killeen | EURACTIV.com (updated: 5 January. 2022 г.)
Attention: There is no refutation of the information that the Euronews channel is fully or partially controlled and financed by Viktor Orban!
Always double-check this source of information!
″ https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/personal-and-professional-links-between-orban-and-new-euronews-owner/″ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.142.201.116 ( talk) 09:09, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
I am 'Modern Cromwell'. I have remeoved viwer figures from the text.
References supporting them were Euronews documents - hardly neutral. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Modern Cromwell ( talk • contribs) 00:25, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Your comments are the ones that are hardly neutral by calling Euronews a propaganda tool. -- Golstein ( talk) 16:37, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Well when an organisation claims independence but in fact pushes a line and is subsidised by tax payer funds to do so, i think it meets the definition of propaganda. However I accept the word has an emotional impact not consistent with a neutral POV so i am happy not to use it. However whoever is editing this from Euronews keeps insisting that it is a 'Public service broadcaster' when it is not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Modern Cromwell ( talk • contribs) 01:14, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
In an effort to end this discussion Wikipedia's own entry on public service broadcasting containes the following as part of the definition (taken from the UK Broadcasting Research Unit): 'Detachment from vested interests and government in which programming is impartial, and the broadcaster is not be subject to control by advertisers or government.Italic text
Euronews hardly meets this criterion (or indeed a number of others mentioned in the article) and thus cannot be called a Public Service Broadcaster. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Modern Cromwell ( talk • contribs) 01:34, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
I've added cable channels but it does not show up in the template. too many maybe?! -- Pedro ( talk) 14:46, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Subliminal message considering their anti-Israel approach and biased coverage ? Radical-Dreamer ( talk) 12:45, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
There's a slow-motion edit war going on between me (sorry) and an unregistered user who keeps hopping IPs, making communication difficult. For that reason, here's a thread for discussing the issue behind the revert cycle.
I seek the opinions of the community here, for purposes of my own sanity ◦ Trey Maturin 17:49, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved — Amakuru ( talk) 16:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Euronews →
Euronews NBC – NBC bought a 25% stake in Euronews and has renamed the network, Euronews NBC, according to the New York Times.
[1]
References
Thunderbolt.wiki ( talk) 22:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
I think that is a important change than made the article must be uptades. I made some changes already, but I think must be made a all article revision.
I only have two articles reference in spanish, but I think in the next days will be more articles in many languages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fharlock ( talk • contribs) 12:44, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: voluntarily closed by the user and moved when official. I apologize for creating this move request so quickly, but I would like to let you know that I did find a source that says NBCUniversal closed the deal here. When the name change is official, this article can be moved. ( non-admin closure) 2601:8C:4001:DCB9:91C0:B17C:7195:720C ( talk) 20:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Euronews → EuronewsNBC – I believe the purchase by NBCUniversal was completed yesterday. 2601:8C:4001:DCB9:C49:9E5B:672C:A0C9 ( talk) 11:39, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Contesting reason: There is no official source which confirms that the name of the company has also been changed. The official website still reflect EURONEWS. Yashovardhan ( talk) 14:06, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Wait: Please calm down and get out of the "gotta be first to file the scoop!" mindset. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. As noted in the "requested move" discussion of February 20 (just a couple of sections above), we generally follow the "common name" guideline for article titles. In this case the common name is what the channel calls itself. (Note that the article is primarily about the channel, not the company.) The channel and the website are still calling themselves "Euronews" even though the purchase may have been completed. (And by the way, we have not seen a RS confirming that completion.) All editors appreciate other editors who want to help keep the encyclopedia up to date, but being not-a-newspaper we don't need to be up to the minute. As long as this company keeps calling itself simply "Euronews" on their web site, in their logo, in the branding they use on the air, and etc., that's what the article title should be per our P&G. Jeh ( talk) 14:25, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Euronews. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)