Anyone who has played the game going to develop the plot like the New Wave game? I'd personally love to know what occurs in this game. Modem ( talk) 09:39, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:EurekaSevenNV.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
For consistency with Eureka Seven vol. 1: New Wave. 76.16.188.239 ( talk) 21:57, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- 3.0 Presentation: Long cutscenes dominate the game and aren't worth all the time it takes to watch them.
- 5.5 Graphics: Same level of quality as the first, not great, but less impressive since art gets recycled here.
- 4.0 Sound: A lot of voice acting done by actors who don't seem to be too excited about being here.
- 3.5 Gameplay: As the focus moves from the tolerable ground warfare to the worthless and confusing air combat the whole game suffers.
- 3.0 Lasting Appeal: A few minutes into the first air battle serious doubt about finishing the game will appear. This grows with every other air battle after that.
- 3.7: Bad OVERALL (out of 10 / not an average)"
- Ranked #802 out of 4532 rated PS2 games
- Published by: Bandai, Developed by: BEC, Genre: Action, Release Date: US: April 17, 2007, Japan: May 9, 2006, Anime Profile: Eureka Seven, MSRP: $39.99
RPG and storytelling games will on average perform less well with this scoring system. See a category for story, or dialogue? WP:PLOT on one side, First-person shooter reviewers on the other. Anarchangel ( talk) 12:19, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Head over to the Animanga wikiproject to discuss. —Kirt Message 19:43, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Anyone who has played the game going to develop the plot like the New Wave game? I'd personally love to know what occurs in this game. Modem ( talk) 09:39, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:EurekaSevenNV.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
For consistency with Eureka Seven vol. 1: New Wave. 76.16.188.239 ( talk) 21:57, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- 3.0 Presentation: Long cutscenes dominate the game and aren't worth all the time it takes to watch them.
- 5.5 Graphics: Same level of quality as the first, not great, but less impressive since art gets recycled here.
- 4.0 Sound: A lot of voice acting done by actors who don't seem to be too excited about being here.
- 3.5 Gameplay: As the focus moves from the tolerable ground warfare to the worthless and confusing air combat the whole game suffers.
- 3.0 Lasting Appeal: A few minutes into the first air battle serious doubt about finishing the game will appear. This grows with every other air battle after that.
- 3.7: Bad OVERALL (out of 10 / not an average)"
- Ranked #802 out of 4532 rated PS2 games
- Published by: Bandai, Developed by: BEC, Genre: Action, Release Date: US: April 17, 2007, Japan: May 9, 2006, Anime Profile: Eureka Seven, MSRP: $39.99
RPG and storytelling games will on average perform less well with this scoring system. See a category for story, or dialogue? WP:PLOT on one side, First-person shooter reviewers on the other. Anarchangel ( talk) 12:19, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Head over to the Animanga wikiproject to discuss. —Kirt Message 19:43, 19 April 2015 (UTC)