This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Eureka Forbes article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In my 19 years of existence , this is the first time i have heard aquaguarded ! Seems like someone from the company added this just to make their company look good. --
TvKimi 08:22, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
The products used to be excellent and are still good but the same cannot be said about their service now.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.168.27.131 ( talk) 14:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Eureka Forbes article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In my 19 years of existence , this is the first time i have heard aquaguarded ! Seems like someone from the company added this just to make their company look good. --
TvKimi 08:22, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
The products used to be excellent and are still good but the same cannot be said about their service now.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.168.27.131 ( talk) 14:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)