This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Plants Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Australia: New South Wales / South Australia / Tasmania / Victoria / Biota Low‑importance Eucalyptus viminalis is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales, or the State Library of Victoria, or the State Library of South Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

I have no idea where you get field distribution map data from, but the South Australian map is definitely wrong. The Yorke Peninsula is coloured in, whereas it should be the Mt Lofty Ranges (to the east, across the Gulf St Vincent). Simple mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.127.252.5 ( talk) 05:15, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Was it ever used as a medicine? 173.88.246.138 ( talk) 05:27, 19 February 2021 (UTC) reply