 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Category:Pseudoscience on the grounds that said epithet (a highly stigmatizing, and often unfair, epithet, IMO) was unjustified on the grounds that this is a novel or allegory or satire and hence does not claim to scientific and hence cannot be considered pseudoscience. Okay?-- Solomonfromfinland ( talk) 02:27, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Category:Pseudoscience on the grounds that said epithet (a highly stigmatizing, and often unfair, epithet, IMO) was unjustified on the grounds that this is a novel or allegory or satire and hence does not claim to scientific and hence cannot be considered pseudoscience. Okay?-- Solomonfromfinland ( talk) 02:27, 30 January 2015 (UTC)