This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 September 2020 and 11 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): SSergeant.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 20:54, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Comments on notice:
This article is based on an entry from the 1918 edition of Gray's Anatomy, which is in the public domain. As such, some of the information contained herein may be outdated. Please edit the article if this is the case, and feel free to remove this notice when it is no longer relevant.
I'd like to suggest some changes in wording:
This article refers to magnetite deposits in the ethmoid bone, and cites El Reg as a source. El Reg is an IT webzine, not a medical journal: there must be a better, more authoritative cite for this. -- The Anome 10:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Could this be the appropriate reference? Or another paper by the same people? -- The Anome 10:18, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
I hope the sagittal picture won't create misunderstandings, because it is located in the "injuries"-section. I mean, somebody might take it as:
"A severe injury to the ethmoid bone is a sagittal section of the skull. The patient looks like this after the injury. As you see, the whole brain has already fallen out of the big hole resulting from such an injury. There is currently no treatment for sagittal section of the skull, but the patient is mostly recommended painkillers." Mikael Häggström 19:40, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
The scientific article Evidence of a nonlinear human magnetic sense has been misquoted. The terms nose, magnetite and ethmoid appear nowhere in the article. Therefore I've removed it from the list of references. With respect to the statement about magnetite in the human nose, I believe we should either find a proper reference or remove the statement altogether. Also see the discussion on Magnetoception. Dragice ( talk) 23:00, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
I have proposed this merge, between the 'ossification' page and this article, because:
From the term "cubical bone" on, there is very little to help the reader understand the structure.
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 September 2020 and 11 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): SSergeant.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 20:54, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Comments on notice:
This article is based on an entry from the 1918 edition of Gray's Anatomy, which is in the public domain. As such, some of the information contained herein may be outdated. Please edit the article if this is the case, and feel free to remove this notice when it is no longer relevant.
I'd like to suggest some changes in wording:
This article refers to magnetite deposits in the ethmoid bone, and cites El Reg as a source. El Reg is an IT webzine, not a medical journal: there must be a better, more authoritative cite for this. -- The Anome 10:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Could this be the appropriate reference? Or another paper by the same people? -- The Anome 10:18, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
I hope the sagittal picture won't create misunderstandings, because it is located in the "injuries"-section. I mean, somebody might take it as:
"A severe injury to the ethmoid bone is a sagittal section of the skull. The patient looks like this after the injury. As you see, the whole brain has already fallen out of the big hole resulting from such an injury. There is currently no treatment for sagittal section of the skull, but the patient is mostly recommended painkillers." Mikael Häggström 19:40, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
The scientific article Evidence of a nonlinear human magnetic sense has been misquoted. The terms nose, magnetite and ethmoid appear nowhere in the article. Therefore I've removed it from the list of references. With respect to the statement about magnetite in the human nose, I believe we should either find a proper reference or remove the statement altogether. Also see the discussion on Magnetoception. Dragice ( talk) 23:00, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
I have proposed this merge, between the 'ossification' page and this article, because:
From the term "cubical bone" on, there is very little to help the reader understand the structure.