Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A comprehensive, wide-ranging, well referenced and well illustrated article.
This is quite a long article, so my review took some time do. This is an outstanding GA; my only comment is that you are possibly a bit over enthusiastic about linking, aldehyde for example only "needs" (it may not need any) a maximum of one link in a section, not one link per subsection. Note: aldehyde is a poor example, "hydrated" was far worse, but its the last one I changed.
I suggest that you consider WP:FAC next.
I'm awarding GA-class, it is richly deserved. Pyrotec ( talk) 18:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A comprehensive, wide-ranging, well referenced and well illustrated article.
This is quite a long article, so my review took some time do. This is an outstanding GA; my only comment is that you are possibly a bit over enthusiastic about linking, aldehyde for example only "needs" (it may not need any) a maximum of one link in a section, not one link per subsection. Note: aldehyde is a poor example, "hydrated" was far worse, but its the last one I changed.
I suggest that you consider WP:FAC next.
I'm awarding GA-class, it is richly deserved. Pyrotec ( talk) 18:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)