This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article on the Esphigmenou Monastery is very far from beeing neutral. The autor does not hide that he is a supporter of the monastery, he accuses the present patriarch of Constantinople of beeing an heretic etc. I think an entirely new article, worthy of Wikipedia, should be written by a competent person. As this monastery is quite a lot in the international medias, I think it is important. Fratersolberg 11:23, 24 December 2006 (UTC)fratersolberg
I have completed a full rewrite of the article. IMHO it is in much better shape now. At any rate, any feedback is welcome. -- Michalis Famelis (talk) 19:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
I think the article is now biased against the monastery. The claim that the old brotherhood in Karyes, whom the article unneutrally calls "squatters," attacked the new invaders is disputed. There is also no mention of the monk that was killed or the years long blockade of the monastery that has prevented food and medicine from reaching these aged monks. They are even prevented from fishing right outside their monastery.
Wikigator
21:01, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
the term squatters is completely unfounded ---ba —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
69.148.49.52 (
talk)
05:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
There has been some recent edits moving from one bias to another, now to an extreme. Things are going to have to change, the article is full of unsourced, POV pushing material at this point. I will post some problems later and see what can be agreed on? 75.73.114.111 ( talk) 12:53, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article on the Esphigmenou Monastery is very far from beeing neutral. The autor does not hide that he is a supporter of the monastery, he accuses the present patriarch of Constantinople of beeing an heretic etc. I think an entirely new article, worthy of Wikipedia, should be written by a competent person. As this monastery is quite a lot in the international medias, I think it is important. Fratersolberg 11:23, 24 December 2006 (UTC)fratersolberg
I have completed a full rewrite of the article. IMHO it is in much better shape now. At any rate, any feedback is welcome. -- Michalis Famelis (talk) 19:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
I think the article is now biased against the monastery. The claim that the old brotherhood in Karyes, whom the article unneutrally calls "squatters," attacked the new invaders is disputed. There is also no mention of the monk that was killed or the years long blockade of the monastery that has prevented food and medicine from reaching these aged monks. They are even prevented from fishing right outside their monastery.
Wikigator
21:01, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
the term squatters is completely unfounded ---ba —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
69.148.49.52 (
talk)
05:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
There has been some recent edits moving from one bias to another, now to an extreme. Things are going to have to change, the article is full of unsourced, POV pushing material at this point. I will post some problems later and see what can be agreed on? 75.73.114.111 ( talk) 12:53, 25 February 2013 (UTC)