This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Libraries Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. San Diego Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject San Diego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to San Diego and San Diego County on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.San DiegoWikipedia:WikiProject San DiegoTemplate:WikiProject San DiegoSan Diego articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject San Diego To-do: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : Rate San Diego related articles from Category:Unassessed San Diego articles and Category:Unknown-importance San Diego articles with the {{ WikiProject San Diego}} project banner. Cleanup : A cleanup listing for this project is available: clean-up listing for San_Diego Expand : San Miguel Mountain, Most articles from Category:Stub-Class San Diego articles. Photo : Request photos that are needed from Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in San Diego County, California to include in each article. Stubs : Work on articles in Category:San Diego County, California geography stubs. Other : * Add {{ WikiProject San Diego}} project banner to related articles' talk pages and assess. Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality. Get San Diego into Featured article status. Improve groups of articles to meet the standards for a Good or Featured Topic.

This page at points appears to be an advertisement for the need for a new library. While noble, thats not the purpose of an encyclopedia entry. Hence I deleted several remarks regarding the workload of the librarians, non-planned for internet usage, etc. If they could have predicted the growth of the internet in later decades, I imagine they would be billionaires and we would have a new library. Furthermore, some points of the article seemed to be at odds with other points, including the circulation of over 930,000 while later in the article a statement of "three times [the cardholder population] of circulation."

I've added some references for individuals to see where the information is coming from. Esclib 19:57, 2 April 2007 (UTC) reply