 | A fact from Erythrina velutina appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 27 March 2010 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Why is this listed as being introduced or native to a lot of places, none of them Australia, while the picture is from Brisbane? 67.169.94.126 ( talk) 19:30, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- It's a bit problematic—the picture is from Brisbane, and is apparently really E. velutina, but I haven't been able to find a source that lists the tree as occurring in Australia. Ucucha 19:35, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
|
| A fact from Erythrina velutina appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 27 March 2010 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| |
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Why is this listed as being introduced or native to a lot of places, none of them Australia, while the picture is from Brisbane? 67.169.94.126 ( talk) 19:30, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- It's a bit problematic—the picture is from Brisbane, and is apparently really E. velutina, but I haven't been able to find a source that lists the tree as occurring in Australia. Ucucha 19:35, 27 March 2010 (UTC)