![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article lack citations.
The general origins of Tetrapods should be at that entry, not at this one famous genus. Much work has been done in this area in the last forty years. Wetman 19:13, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
I could try to write a single article on Eryops, then we could take the remaining info and decide where it best fits, in ampbibian or tetrapod. -- DanielCD 20:17, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Yea, Ill make an article for the genus and move the rest of the info here to the talk page. Then we can "dissect" it. -- DanielCD 20:46, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
There it is, edit it to your will. I'm outta time now, but will look at again it in a day or two. -- DanielCD 21:25, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
How many mya this great beast lived needs to be included in the article.
The date of initial description is 1877, not 1882. Wil someone edit this, as I cannot figure out how to get into the binomial name editing process.
"(Eryops is) ... a remarkable example of natural engineering'."
-- I'm not aware of any organism that isn't. --
Writtenonsand (
talk)
11:35, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
No they smell like nuts
"It is taken that Eryops was not very active, thus a
predatory lifestyle, while possible, was probably not the norm. It is more likely that it fed on
fish either in the water or on those that became stranded at the margins of lakes and
swamps. A large supply of terrestrial
invertebrates were also abundant at the time, and this may have provided a fairly adequate food supply in itself."
--
Predator says: "A predator is an animal that hunts and kills other organisms, usually for food." So fish and invertebrates don't count as "other organisms"? --
Writtenonsand (
talk)
11:39, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure it lived in the Carboniferous...- DaAaAaAaAaA ( talk) 20:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
This very old paper says four [1], but it appears to be commonly restored with five. FunkMonk ( talk) 11:40, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
That's a powerful statement. Did all Eryops practice abstinence? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.70.113 ( talk) 23:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article lack citations.
The general origins of Tetrapods should be at that entry, not at this one famous genus. Much work has been done in this area in the last forty years. Wetman 19:13, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
I could try to write a single article on Eryops, then we could take the remaining info and decide where it best fits, in ampbibian or tetrapod. -- DanielCD 20:17, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Yea, Ill make an article for the genus and move the rest of the info here to the talk page. Then we can "dissect" it. -- DanielCD 20:46, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
There it is, edit it to your will. I'm outta time now, but will look at again it in a day or two. -- DanielCD 21:25, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
How many mya this great beast lived needs to be included in the article.
The date of initial description is 1877, not 1882. Wil someone edit this, as I cannot figure out how to get into the binomial name editing process.
"(Eryops is) ... a remarkable example of natural engineering'."
-- I'm not aware of any organism that isn't. --
Writtenonsand (
talk)
11:35, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
No they smell like nuts
"It is taken that Eryops was not very active, thus a
predatory lifestyle, while possible, was probably not the norm. It is more likely that it fed on
fish either in the water or on those that became stranded at the margins of lakes and
swamps. A large supply of terrestrial
invertebrates were also abundant at the time, and this may have provided a fairly adequate food supply in itself."
--
Predator says: "A predator is an animal that hunts and kills other organisms, usually for food." So fish and invertebrates don't count as "other organisms"? --
Writtenonsand (
talk)
11:39, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure it lived in the Carboniferous...- DaAaAaAaAaA ( talk) 20:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
This very old paper says four [1], but it appears to be commonly restored with five. FunkMonk ( talk) 11:40, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
That's a powerful statement. Did all Eryops practice abstinence? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.70.113 ( talk) 23:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)