From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Huh?

How can this be ranked low when according to the furry fandom article ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furry_fandom) it was a discussion of Steve Gallacci’s Albedo Anthropomorphics which created the very term furry? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.9.157.248 ( talk) 05:58, 17 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Because, alas, importance refers more to popularity than historical significance. It is more likely that people will come looking for Ozy and Millie, thus that article has a higher importance, because more people will benefit from improvements to it. GreenReaper ( talk) 07:56, 11 September 2008 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Huh?

How can this be ranked low when according to the furry fandom article ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furry_fandom) it was a discussion of Steve Gallacci’s Albedo Anthropomorphics which created the very term furry? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.9.157.248 ( talk) 05:58, 17 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Because, alas, importance refers more to popularity than historical significance. It is more likely that people will come looking for Ozy and Millie, thus that article has a higher importance, because more people will benefit from improvements to it. GreenReaper ( talk) 07:56, 11 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook