From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Amnesty International section

This section needs to be seriously hacked back or removed, the sourcing is appalling...her own articles, press releases, blogs etc. Theroadislong ( talk) 15:36, 24 November 2017 (UTC) reply

That would be preferable. Content can be added back with better sources but much of this is original research. Theroadislong ( talk) 15:43, 24 November 2017 (UTC) reply
Unfortunately the article has never established the subject's notability since its creation, and is still fueled by primary sources despite the content removal. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 03:03, 25 November 2017 (UTC) reply
No such page in Spanish Wikipedia. Xx236 ( talk) 14:29, 28 November 2017 (UTC) reply
[2] Xx236 ( talk) 14:31, 28 November 2017 (UTC) reply
I fully agree. Content of he article is poorly documented and does not meat quality standards. De bonne foi ( talk) 16:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Amnesty International section

This section needs to be seriously hacked back or removed, the sourcing is appalling...her own articles, press releases, blogs etc. Theroadislong ( talk) 15:36, 24 November 2017 (UTC) reply

That would be preferable. Content can be added back with better sources but much of this is original research. Theroadislong ( talk) 15:43, 24 November 2017 (UTC) reply
Unfortunately the article has never established the subject's notability since its creation, and is still fueled by primary sources despite the content removal. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 03:03, 25 November 2017 (UTC) reply
No such page in Spanish Wikipedia. Xx236 ( talk) 14:29, 28 November 2017 (UTC) reply
[2] Xx236 ( talk) 14:31, 28 November 2017 (UTC) reply
I fully agree. Content of he article is poorly documented and does not meat quality standards. De bonne foi ( talk) 16:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook