This article was nominated for
deletion on 5 July 2015. The result of
the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Seems she is a full professor at a major univ., with multiple senior positions and a major Canadian award. Undoubte4dly there are third party refs for it. DGG (
talk)
12:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Nominate article for deletion?
This is not an appropriate article for Wikipedia. It looks like a CV, and just stating that there are "probably third party references" is not enough. They should be included in the article. As well, there are no significant accomplishments listed here. Canada has hundreds of research chairs, professors who have won major international awards, invented things, and have NO ARTICLE / BIO on Wikipedia. This seems like shameless self promotion. Should AfD.
Noresumes (
talk)
06:44, 14 November 2009 (UTC)reply
--
I must agree with the above sentiment. This page is in very poor taste and its continued presence corrupts wikipedia into a vanity publication. Please remove. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Thebiz98 (
talk •
contribs)
23:29, 26 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Nominate article for deletion
In complete agreement with the sentiments expressed prior. 10 years on, and this page still looks like a personal CV. This individual has no major awards or noteworthy accomplishments. Absolute vanity piece with a single consistent contributor (likely herself).
This article was nominated for
deletion on 5 July 2015. The result of
the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Seems she is a full professor at a major univ., with multiple senior positions and a major Canadian award. Undoubte4dly there are third party refs for it. DGG (
talk)
12:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Nominate article for deletion?
This is not an appropriate article for Wikipedia. It looks like a CV, and just stating that there are "probably third party references" is not enough. They should be included in the article. As well, there are no significant accomplishments listed here. Canada has hundreds of research chairs, professors who have won major international awards, invented things, and have NO ARTICLE / BIO on Wikipedia. This seems like shameless self promotion. Should AfD.
Noresumes (
talk)
06:44, 14 November 2009 (UTC)reply
--
I must agree with the above sentiment. This page is in very poor taste and its continued presence corrupts wikipedia into a vanity publication. Please remove. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Thebiz98 (
talk •
contribs)
23:29, 26 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Nominate article for deletion
In complete agreement with the sentiments expressed prior. 10 years on, and this page still looks like a personal CV. This individual has no major awards or noteworthy accomplishments. Absolute vanity piece with a single consistent contributor (likely herself).