![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Era be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This could stand a good disambiguation? Are there any votes in favor or against? Emperorbma
This seems to be an article to me, not a disambiguation page. Should we liberate the page and remove the {{ disambig}} tag?-- Commander Keane 17:04, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
--
Jerzy•
t
15:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Ěŏö — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CC8C:3480:512A:FEE4:75C3:E2D1 ( talk) 00:45, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Trying to rate this article. Candidate ratings are stub and start. Start means it contains some relevant info, but something's missing. Stub may mean that too, but that it is in a state of flux or mess. I rate this article being a stub, because it's still messy and lacking more on science/astronomy and a separation between social science and colloquial/medial use. Social science are kind of sciences. Said: Rursus ☻ 10:01, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
WHAT? -- Infinitynerd ( talk) 02:39, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure I've got sources for this, but in English the word era is widely synonymous with the words epoch, period, time, etc, while in other languages this is much less so. In French, the word era is still associated with the religious term Christian era ( Anno Domini), and so it is perhaps less used as a general term for any given moment of history. ADM ( talk) 22:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC) uhh please tell me how long an era is!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.105.127.191 ( talk) 21:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Era. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:07, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
I think that any Ancient Roman or Greek related pages in particular ought to use the Common Era CE/BCE format. Since they were not Christian regions, yet have lots of articles written about them, the more neutral and academically accepted style is CE/BCE. — Moops ⋠ T⋡ 18:53, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Era be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This could stand a good disambiguation? Are there any votes in favor or against? Emperorbma
This seems to be an article to me, not a disambiguation page. Should we liberate the page and remove the {{ disambig}} tag?-- Commander Keane 17:04, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
--
Jerzy•
t
15:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Ěŏö — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CC8C:3480:512A:FEE4:75C3:E2D1 ( talk) 00:45, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Trying to rate this article. Candidate ratings are stub and start. Start means it contains some relevant info, but something's missing. Stub may mean that too, but that it is in a state of flux or mess. I rate this article being a stub, because it's still messy and lacking more on science/astronomy and a separation between social science and colloquial/medial use. Social science are kind of sciences. Said: Rursus ☻ 10:01, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
WHAT? -- Infinitynerd ( talk) 02:39, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure I've got sources for this, but in English the word era is widely synonymous with the words epoch, period, time, etc, while in other languages this is much less so. In French, the word era is still associated with the religious term Christian era ( Anno Domini), and so it is perhaps less used as a general term for any given moment of history. ADM ( talk) 22:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC) uhh please tell me how long an era is!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.105.127.191 ( talk) 21:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Era. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:07, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
I think that any Ancient Roman or Greek related pages in particular ought to use the Common Era CE/BCE format. Since they were not Christian regions, yet have lots of articles written about them, the more neutral and academically accepted style is CE/BCE. — Moops ⋠ T⋡ 18:53, 16 December 2022 (UTC)