This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Surely someone jests? This can't be much above stub, and certainly no higher than start? -- Legis ( talk - contribs) 17:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Agreed. DrKiernan ( talk) 13:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC) reply

I'm not opposed to the use of this word, but most people would not understand it without a dictionary. It would be helpful to add a parenthetical expression so people don't need to look up the definition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.9.207.189 ( talk) 20:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The first sentence, which declares this relief a cause of action "in law" strikes me as misleading, since redemption is an explicitly equitable action. Jureperitus ( talk) 21:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC) reply